incubator-sanselan-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org>
Subject Re: New non-Apache Sanselan release
Date Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:22:01 GMT
Charles Matthew Chen wrote:
>    On reflection, I think we should make the test data separate from
> the unit tests.  Not all of the unit tests use the test data.
> Moreover, the test data is quite large (and will hopefully continue to
> grow).
> 
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by separating?

I hope to make a test run for building a release sometime next week, so 
we can all have a look and see which things are missing/need to change 
in terms of a distribution.

Carsten

> Charles.
> 
> On Jan 26, 2008 1:35 AM, Charles Matthew Chen <charlesmchen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 to both points.
>>
>> thanks,
>>    charles.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2008 1:58 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 25, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> as we are using maven to build sanselan, we get this for free; the
>>>> only extra work we have to do later on is to put the maven artifact
>>>> (the jar and the pom) into the maven repository (but that's fairly
>>>> simple).
>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> For the download distribution I don't think we should add the wiki
>>>> docs itself as this might give us some legal headaches right now -
>>>> everyone who wrote something on the wiki needs to have a signed CLA
>>>> on file *if* we include this in our releases. I think a link to the
>>>> wiki is enough - at least for a first step.
>>> RIght. I don't see a need to put wiki content into the releases.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Carsten
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>> Hi Charles,
>>>>> On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:32 PM, Charles Matthew Chen wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Craig,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I'm not really familiar with that option.  Can you elaborate or
>>>>>> perhaps share a url?
>>>>> http://maven.apache.org is the starting point for information. I've
>>>>> been using maven for a while now and it's very popular among open
>>>>> source projects. In order to use sanselan in a project, all you
>>>>> need to do is to include a few lines of code in an xml file and
>>>>> you're done. Maven will download the jar file and include it in
>>>>> your build and run environments.
>>>>> For example, to use sanselan in another project, you'd declare this
>>>>> in your configuration file:
>>>>>        <dependency>
>>>>>            <groupId>org.apache.sanselan</groupId>
>>>>>            <artifactId>sanselan</artifactId>
>>>>>            <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>>>>        </dependency>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  What trade-offs do we face in this decision?
>>>>> It's just a bit more work setting up the publication of the jar
>>>>> file in the maven repository. All the usual due diligence is still
>>>>> required to prepare the jar file for publication.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Carsten Ziegeler
>>>> cziegeler@apache.org
>>>
>>> Craig Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>>
> 


-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org

Mime
View raw message