I agree with Jeremias. If there was maintenance to be done, it could
have been branched.
Craig
On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Why exactly did you revert the package renaming? If it's just for
> doing
> a maintenance release with the old package structure, a branch would
> have been better. In the end it has to be org.apache.sanselan.
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
>
> On 17.11.2007 22:58:40 cmchen wrote:
>> Author: cmchen
>> Date: Sat Nov 17 13:58:22 2007
>> New Revision: 596008
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596008&view=rev
>> Log:
>> restored original package structure (from org.apache.sanselan.* ->
>> org.cmc.sanselan.*).
> <snip/>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
|