incubator-s4-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: draft of ASF board report
Date Wed, 04 Sep 2013 03:16:52 GMT
Great work Kurtt Lin! Keep new features coming!


Renato M.


2013/9/3 Kurtt Lin <kurtt.lin@gmail.com>

> Hi, Flavio, Matthieu, Patrick, and all
>
> Cheer up, guys. I'm seeing opportunities in this stream processing field as
> well as in S4. What I haven’t mentioned is that, S4 had found successful
> applications in our research group even back in the 0.3.0 days and now in
> our start-up. We have built scalable real time search over microblogs with
> some S4 features enhanced (the paper appears in 2013’s EDBT proceedings,
> link is
> http://www.edbt.org/Proceedings/2013-Genova/papers/edbt/a31-lin.pdf);
> we also built a platform on top of S4 for detecting and analyzing real-time
> traffic conditions, processing over hundreds of millions of records every
> day.
>
> Now we plan to contribute to the community. I personally have created and
> responded to some JIRAs, but I would like to do more. Actually, I am
> ongoing proposing a design documentation of integrating S4 with Helix along
> the roadmap; this would help enhancing the elasticity feature for S4.
>
> So, I suppose we could put the "retirement" discussion aside? Give us the
> new comers some time perhaps a couple of months to see what we can do to
> make the community healthier. Of course, some of us are new; we shall ask
> for your help and guidance occasionally, please be responsive (as what you
> are doing now), :)
>
> You all have done brilliant jobs! :)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Correct, I was referring to the rece
> >
> > nt thread about shutting down the
> > s4 podling. In the incubator that's called "retirement"
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
> >
> > Glad to see folks stepping up!
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > > I think Pat is referring to the discussion we have had when I proposed
> > to retire the project. I didn't use this exact word, but it is
> essentially
> > what I meant. You and a few others stepped up and said that you wouldn't
> > like to see it retiring and would like to give it a shot at helping with
> > building a community, contributing patches, and just increasing activity
> in
> > general.
> > >
> > > Does it make sense?
> > >
> > > -Flavio
> > >
> > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 8:27 PM, Oleg Tikhonov <oleg@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> the item 3 - deleted completely.
> > >>
> > >> Can you shed more light on "retirement" discussion. I am new here and
> > >> probably missed it.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I would remove 3 entirely - that's not needed for graduation.
> > >>>
> > >>> You should also mention the result of the "retirement" discussion -
> > >>> give the ipmc/board some insight: that folks stepped up and are
> > >>> pushing forward, i.e. no retirement at this point.
> > >>>
> > >>> Patrick
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Oleg Tikhonov <oleg@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>> Thanks !
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Added Patrick's & Flavio's comments.
> > >>>> http://pastebin.com/M83sB2z8
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Is there anything else?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Oleg
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, FPJ <fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> When you say put out more releases, do you mean more in number
or
> > having
> > >>>>> releases more frequently? S4 has had two releases already,
but the
> > >>>>> frequency
> > >>>>> of releases has been low in the past. I think activity is a
real
> > issue.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Your point 2 is a good summary of what I've been trying to
say. We
> > are
> > >>> on
> > >>>>> the same page there.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Flavio
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> > >>>>>> Sent: 03 September 2013 06:42
> > >>>>>> To: s4-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: draft of ASF board report
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I have a few comments:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 1) I don't think the issues listed in "Three most important
issues
> > to
> > >>>>> address in
> > >>>>>> the move towards graduation" are apropos. What you want
to list
> here
> > >>> is
> > >>>>>> things blocking graduation. IMO this is two things; 1)
put out
> more
> > >>>>> releases,
> > >>>>>> and 2) build community (of which 2 is more important at
this
> point)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2) I think you should also include mention of a PPMC member
> > requesting
> > >>>>>> that the podling be retired - and the results of that discussion.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Patrick
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@zonker.net>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the effort! That looks good to me, except
maybe that
> in
> > >>> my
> > >>>>>>>> view the real issue about graduation is the activity.
Adding
> more
> > >>>>>>>> requirements will only raise up the bar for graduation.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I think the IPMC would expect to see a more active
and
> > >>> self-governing
> > >>>>>>> project before voting for graduation, whether or not
the podling
> > >>> puts
> > >>>>>>> that down as an issue. (See:
> > >>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> jzb
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Joe Brockmeier
> > >>>>>>> jzb@zonker.net
> > >>>>>>> Twitter: @jzb
> > >>>>>>> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message