incubator-s4-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "FPJ" <fpjunque...@yahoo.com>
Subject RE: draft of ASF board report
Date Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:47:28 GMT
If you could create a PoweredBy page on the project wiki, it would be great.

-Flavio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurtt Lin [mailto:kurtt.lin@gmail.com]
> Sent: 08 September 2013 10:32
> To: s4-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: draft of ASF board report
> 
> Hi, Flavio. I started with 0.3; used to make changes required by my
research
> to the code. Then I realized that keeping pace with and contributing to
the
> community is a win-win solution. So, yes, I've migrated to 0.6, even
though I
> still have to maintain some 0.3 applications. As you might have noticed,
I've
> already started submitting proposals/patches, although some of them still
> need improvement.
> 
> Agree with @Flavio that we start a PoweredBy page (if nobody's doing it, I
> shall do it). I believe more applications will be found.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:42 PM, FPJ <fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Agreed, that's very cool. Hey, Kurtt, you're not using 0.3 any longer,
> > you? Hopefully you have migrated to a newer version.
> >
> > I suggest we start a PoweredBy page with this use case.
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: olegtikhonov@gmail.com [mailto:olegtikhonov@gmail.com] On
> > > Behalf Of Oleg Tikhonov
> > > Sent: 04 September 2013 08:03
> > > To: s4-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: draft of ASF board report
> > >
> > > Wow! Well done. Thanks guys. I added our suggestions, thoughts &
> > > intentions to the report. If you don't mind also put Kurtt Lin such
> > great words
> > > in it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <
> > > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Great work Kurtt Lin! Keep new features coming!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Renato M.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/3 Kurtt Lin <kurtt.lin@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Flavio, Matthieu, Patrick, and all
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheer up, guys. I'm seeing opportunities in this stream
> > > > > processing field
> > > > as
> > > > > well as in S4. What I haven’t mentioned is that, S4 had found
> > > > > successful applications in our research group even back in the
> > > > > 0.3.0 days and now in our start-up. We have built scalable real
> > > > > time search over microblogs
> > > > with
> > > > > some S4 features enhanced (the paper appears in 2013’s EDBT
> > > > > proceedings, link is
> > > > > http://www.edbt.org/Proceedings/2013-Genova/papers/edbt/a31-
> > > lin.pdf)
> > > > > ; we also built a platform on top of S4 for detecting and
> > > > > analyzing
> > > > real-time
> > > > > traffic conditions, processing over hundreds of millions of
> > > > > records every day.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now we plan to contribute to the community. I personally have
> > > > > created and responded to some JIRAs, but I would like to do more.
> > > > > Actually, I am ongoing proposing a design documentation of
> > > > > integrating S4 with Helix
> > > > along
> > > > > the roadmap; this would help enhancing the elasticity feature for
S4.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, I suppose we could put the "retirement" discussion aside?
> > > > > Give us the new comers some time perhaps a couple of months to
> > > > > see what we can do to make the community healthier. Of course,
> > > > > some of us are new; we shall ask for your help and guidance
> > > > > occasionally, please be responsive (as what
> > > > you
> > > > > are doing now), :)
> > > > >
> > > > > You all have done brilliant jobs! :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Correct, I was referring to the rece
> > > > > >
> > > > > > nt thread about shutting down the
> > > > > > s4 podling. In the incubator that's called "retirement"
> > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Glad to see folks stepping up!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> > > > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > I think Pat is referring to the discussion we have had
when
> > > > > > > I
> > > > proposed
> > > > > > to retire the project. I didn't use this exact word, but it
is
> > > > > essentially
> > > > > > what I meant. You and a few others stepped up and said that
> > > > > > you
> > > > wouldn't
> > > > > > like to see it retiring and would like to give it a shot at
> > > > > > helping
> > > > with
> > > > > > building a community, contributing patches, and just
> > > > > > increasing
> > > > activity
> > > > > in
> > > > > > general.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does it make sense?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Flavio
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 8:27 PM, Oleg Tikhonov <oleg@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> the item 3 - deleted completely.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Can you shed more light on "retirement" discussion.
I am
> > > > > > >> new here
> > > > and
> > > > > > >> probably missed it.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Patrick Hunt
> > > > > > >> <phunt@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> I would remove 3 entirely - that's not needed for
graduation.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> You should also mention the result of the "retirement"
> > > > > > >>> discussion - give the ipmc/board some insight:
that folks
> > > > > > >>> stepped up and are pushing forward, i.e. no retirement
at
> > > > > > >>> this
> > > point.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Patrick
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Oleg Tikhonov
> > > > > > >>> <oleg@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>> Thanks !
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Added Patrick's & Flavio's comments.
> > > > > > >>>> http://pastebin.com/M83sB2z8
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Is there anything else?
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Cheers,
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Oleg
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, FPJ
> > > > > > >>>> <fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> When you say put out more releases, do
you mean more in
> > > > > > >>>>> number or
> > > > > > having
> > > > > > >>>>> releases more frequently? S4 has had two
releases
> > > > > > >>>>> already, but
> > > > the
> > > > > > >>>>> frequency
> > > > > > >>>>> of releases has been low in the past. I
think activity
> > > > > > >>>>> is a real
> > > > > > issue.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Your point 2 is a good summary of what
I've been trying
> > > > > > >>>>> to
> > say.
> > > > We
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > >>> on
> > > > > > >>>>> the same page there.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> -Flavio
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >>>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]
> > > > > > >>>>>> Sent: 03 September 2013 06:42
> > > > > > >>>>>> To: s4-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: draft of ASF board report
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> I have a few comments:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> 1) I don't think the issues listed
in "Three most
> > > > > > >>>>>> important
> > > > issues
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >>>>> address in
> > > > > > >>>>>> the move towards graduation" are apropos.
What you want
> > > > > > >>>>>> to list
> > > > > here
> > > > > > >>> is
> > > > > > >>>>>> things blocking graduation. IMO this
is two things; 1)
> > > > > > >>>>>> put out
> > > > > more
> > > > > > >>>>> releases,
> > > > > > >>>>>> and 2) build community (of which 2
is more important at
> > > > > > >>>>>> this
> > > > > point)
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> 2) I think you should also include
mention of a PPMC
> > > > > > >>>>>> member
> > > > > > requesting
> > > > > > >>>>>> that the podling be retired - and the
results of that
> > > > discussion.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Patrick
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Joe
Brockmeier
> > > > > > >>>>>> <jzb@zonker.net>
> > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013, at 11:34 AM,
Matthieu Morel wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for the effort! That
looks good to me, except
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> maybe
> > > > that
> > > > > in
> > > > > > >>> my
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> view the real issue about graduation
is the activity.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Adding
> > > > > more
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> requirements will only raise
up the bar for graduation.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> I think the IPMC would expect to
see a more active and
> > > > > > >>> self-governing
> > > > > > >>>>>>> project before voting for graduation,
whether or not
> > > > > > >>>>>>> the
> > > > podling
> > > > > > >>> puts
> > > > > > >>>>>>> that down as an issue. (See:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#communi
> > > > > > >>>>>>> ty)
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> jzb
> > > > > > >>>>>>> --
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Joe Brockmeier
> > > > > > >>>>>>> jzb@zonker.net
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Twitter: @jzb
> > > > > > >>>>>>> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >


Mime
View raw message