incubator-river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: JVM version policy Was: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-jdk1.5 #3
Date Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:40:46 GMT
Peter Firmstone wrote:
> Dennis Reedy wrote:
>> On Dec 2, 2010, at 127PM, MICHAEL MCGRADY wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> Perhaps this will help: on the generic question of going to Java 
>>> 1.6, and my plea not to do it.
>>>
>>> http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/33475
>>>     
>>
>> Michael,
>>
>> Thanks for the link. You may also find more information here: 
>> http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/faq.jsp
>>
>> One thing on this topic that I am curious about is what Oracle's plan 
>> is for RTJ. We certainly cant answer that in this forum. But... will 
>> they keep it? If so, and if they are given a large enough business 
>> opportunity for it's use, will they move towards supporting 1.6? 
>> While this is a very interesting and compelling technical use of 
>> River, is it enough to prohibit River moving to 1.6 and beyond?
>>
>> Just asking ...
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>
> I Spoke to Greg Bollella over the phone about this some time ago, 
> Oracle was quite keen on it, capable of generating lots of data see 
> and well, Oracle have this database...
>
Although I haven't heard anything, this problem might solve itself, 
given 6 months, perhaps there might be a 1.6 release of RTSJ, seeing as 
JSE 1.6 Embedded has also been released.

Cheers,

Peter.


Mime
View raw message