From photark-dev-return-244-apmail-incubator-photark-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Jan 04 04:54:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-photark-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69181 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2010 04:54:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2010 04:54:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 96309 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2010 04:54:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-photark-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96276 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2010 04:54:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact photark-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: photark-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list photark-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96266 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2010 04:54:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:54:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luckbr1975@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.179] (HELO mail-px0-f179.google.com) (209.85.216.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:54:39 +0000 Received: by pxi9 with SMTP id 9so11373585pxi.32 for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:54:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wTEbnFOVjQw9KLOyN2IpnLjFKIf4v8j07M3LE+3sOEI=; b=cCNMSODP7DMrA1/IjX7CBd4JeYtSLxu4GzV+37JyLfXEbd3CfOsvUOCKjvWdKIFQi1 T4MSBofxonSghoJkCB6I2KrjBOpoQdtd6IR2O1+cAxu4VuaYsGtZ8glsutJN8qQOBut7 MpuDVBcNgif7qjZopweQ5MfK8ES+RNim725Eg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cjonQ0GSoR/6iweuiCF+ZHv775QOHCANGMxrjW6YuOSu2d1tHvR4cbWQfuitTekVp3 0rX+4grsVLA0vyv1ML5gZ0gva6hpIrPUF33TX8K1Rbfidrtnq1V42+LsoOwuD+eyCCLf BKMn7Jzt+wbNWDVnZJ6AYTsqu2nh/tnoS6y2c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.108.20 with SMTP id k20mr4216962rvm.156.1262580857571; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:54:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5a75db780912282105q33994ed6ldab8759865d5372d@mail.gmail.com> <5a75db780912291019l3cb1e40axbc7e73b05e334995@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:54:17 -0800 Message-ID: <5a75db781001032054t4ed759bboc3852bcebc7fb2f9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Standalone PhotArk and duplicate UI resources From: Luciano Resende To: photark-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:22 AM, avdhesh .java wro= te: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Luciano Resende w= rote: > >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:29 AM, avdhesh .java >> wrote: >> > As per my Understanding we will have same UI for all versions(google a= pps >> > engine , =A0JCR).What differs is the underline implementations (filesy= stem >> > based for google engine and JCR based)..We already have seperate proje= ct >> for >> > the implementation part.. >> > >> > We already have =A0photark-webapps version for photark UI. >> > >> >> What I think we might need in the future is : >> >> photark-webapp >> =A0 - this would be a full blow photark application and would be >> suitable for deploying in a app server that does not impose >> restrictions... >> >> photark-appengine-webapp >> =A0 - this would have dependency on the filesystem impl and the photark >> ui, and the would have the necessary appengine configuration side >> files etc >> > > etc.... >> > > That means we have following projects. > > *photark* : Java Source > *photark-ui* : front end for the gallery and albums > *photark-admin-ui* : administation ui > *photark-webapp*: =A0 configuration side files for deployment on appserve= r e.g > tomcat , jetty etc > *photark-appengine-webapp*: configuration side files for deployment on th= e > google apps engine > > I agree with these project. > I have implemented a a structure very similar to the one described above. The photark-ui is actually a war, that gets overlayed to one of the final photark application. Please take a look and provide any feedback --=20 Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/