incubator-photark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Standalone PhotArk and duplicate UI resources
Date Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:54:17 GMT
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:22 AM, avdhesh .java <avdhesh.java@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:29 AM, avdhesh .java <avdhesh.java@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > As per my Understanding we will have same UI for all versions(google apps
>> > engine ,  JCR).What differs is the underline implementations (filesystem
>> > based for google engine and JCR based)..We already have seperate project
>> for
>> > the implementation part..
>> >
>> > We already have  photark-webapps version for photark UI.
>> >
>>
>> What I think we might need in the future is :
>>
>> photark-webapp
>>   - this would be a full blow photark application and would be
>> suitable for deploying in a app server that does not impose
>> restrictions...
>>
>> photark-appengine-webapp
>>   - this would have dependency on the filesystem impl and the photark
>> ui, and the would have the necessary appengine configuration side
>> files etc
>>
>
> etc....
>>
>
> That means we have following projects.
>
> *photark* : Java Source
> *photark-ui* : front end for the gallery and albums
> *photark-admin-ui* : administation ui
> *photark-webapp*:   configuration side files for deployment on appserver e.g
> tomcat , jetty etc
> *photark-appengine-webapp*: configuration side files for deployment on the
> google apps engine
>
> I agree with these project.
>

I have implemented a a structure very similar to the one described
above. The photark-ui is actually a war, that gets overlayed to one of
the final photark application.

Please take a look and provide any feedback


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message