incubator-openmeetings-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexei Fedotov <>
Subject Re: some issue with the chat panel and the fontsize
Date Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:24:45 GMT
Hello Sebastian,
Happy Christmas! :-)

Thanks for good questions, I'm looking into this.

With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
+7 916 562 8095

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:04 AM,
<> wrote:
> Hi Alexei,
> Happy Christmas :) I hope you had some nice holidays!
> I have some questions regarding the code for the font sizes.
> The icon that you are using, we should not include the icons and compile it
> into the application. We have a theme XML file.
> Have a look in chatTabBottom.lzx Line 173:
> <miniIconsImage src="$once{ canvas.getThemeImage('button_cancel_rsc') }"
> button_cancel_rsc is the name of the ressource configured in the
> default-theme.xml file.
> Also we need to make sure that all our icons are compatible with the APL.
> Where did you copy the font.png from, what License is it?
> I see that there are some other icons in the file:
> WebContent/src/modules/conference/tabcontent/chat/library.lzx that have no
> License.
> I guess some of them are not even in use and can be deleted.
> However every icon that we include needs a proper documentation where it has
> been copied from.
> See for example:
> WebContent/src/modules/conference/tabcontent/library.lzx:
>     <!-- FamFam Icon Set -->
>     <resource name="messagebox_info_rsc" src="resources/information.png" />
> The comment tells anybody that we have taken that icon from the FamFam Icon
> set. And in our NOTICE file we have this comment:
> This product includes icons from FamFamFam Icon Set Silk.
> The comment links to the NOTICE, and in that sense we have the correct
> attribution of the Icon done.
> However for those font size icons there is no attribution at all. We can't
> release that.
> Also the icons itself look not sharp, the reason is that you are stretching
> them. Is there a reason for stretching the icons? If there is no real need
> for a stretch then it would look much better if you would use the icons in
> its original size and modify the surrounding box to match the icons, instead
> of stretching every icon to fit into your box (or you look for icons that
> have the needed 24x24 size). The icons you are using are 16x16 so you should
> actually use that for the UI also.
> Sebastian
> --
> Sebastian Wagner

View raw message