Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73868D1DE for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77269 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2012 18:02:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77223 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2012 18:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77206 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2012 18:02:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gcaiou-ooo-users@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.3] (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:02:04 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TV4W6-0003xu-9d for ooo-users@incubator.apache.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:01:50 +0100 Received: from p57b5a140.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.181.161.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:01:50 +0100 Received: from villeroy by p57b5a140.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:01:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBTw6RnZXI=?= Subject: Re: Java Runtime Environment Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:00:04 +0100 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: villeroy@t-online.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57b5a140.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 04.11.2012 18:05, Fernando Cassia wrote: > So is there any reason for telling users to install Java 6 instead of Java > 7?. Java is backwards compatible, and I never had any problem running any > Java based software with the current Java7u9. > > FC Reportedly, the language tool extension does not work with Java 7. Under Linux all Java databases including the embedded ones do not run properly with Java 7. There are dozends of issues with different versions of LibreOffice, OpenOffice, Java7, Java6, 32 bit, 64 bit, extensions and databases on various platforms. For the all current versions of both office suites Java6 seems to be the best advice. For Windows it needs to be the one for 32-bit platform in any case, even if Java 7 works for you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org