Mailing-List: contact ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 21:10:04 -0300
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile <arielch@apache.org>
To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OT] OO-dev was Re: Help please
Message-ID: <20121008001004.GA7901@localhost>
References: <1349538759.70382.YahooMailNeo@web43134.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
 <50708B26.9030603@apache.org>
 <CADo7T4c_-hLyQ3Gx8YDu8GeXn4=+c48j2gsBkMEJmafcp4W+bw@mail.gmail.com>
 <k4qjpf$5p8$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <20121007035401.GA15544@localhost>
 <k4t4hs$3ve$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <k4t4hs$3ve$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi Gary,

On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 04:51:24PM -0700, NoOp wrote:
> With apologies to the OP of this thread... I see you've gotten your
> issue sorted out, so I hope that you don't mind if I side-track your
> thread for a bit in order to sort out the OO-dev install. Thanks.
>=20
> On 10/06/2012 08:54 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:53:01PM -0700, NoOp wrote:
> ...
> >> Interesting:
> >> <http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html>
> >> [Download Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1]
> >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snap=
shot+Builds>
> >> [Unofficial Developer Builds for Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1]
> >=20
> > Oh, shame on us, these "Dev.Snaps" are the 3.4.1 release. Real Developer
> > Snapshots can be found at
> > http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/r1391723/ (they install as
> > OOo Dev 3.5 without replacing the current stable installation). We
> > should start building a new Dev. Snapshot by this next week.
>=20
> Thanks Ariel. I have the deb build on this machine:
> AOO350m1(Build:9610)  -  Rev. 1373721
> 2012-08-16_04:25:33-Rev.1373730
> and just downloaded and installed the RPM build on Fedora 17.
> AOO350m1(Build:9610)  -  Rev. 1391723
> 2012-09-30_06:33:16-Rev.1373730 - Linux i686
>=20
> On the new RPM build installs just fine as Oo-dev 3.5.0. Well done &
> thanks for that (OO-dev).
>=20
> On the new RPM build no desktop-integration directory & file is
> included. Is that on purpose, or a problem with the build? Note: It was
> easy enough to add the soffice menu by hand, but just curious to see if
> if was not included on purpose.

By definition, Developer Snapshots don't come with desktop integration
(I can't recall if in OOo times they did this differently, but I guess
it was the same, as we didn't change anything in this area).

May be it makes sense to design a minimal desktop integration with the
*.desktop files and their respective images only, but no mime
definitions.


Regards
--=20
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=6knF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--