Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 028F0D0B1 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55631 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2012 16:15:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55597 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2012 16:15:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55589 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2012 16:15:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:15:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gcaiou-ooo-users@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.3] (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:15:42 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1THdDq-0003N4-G1 for ooo-users@incubator.apache.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:15:26 +0200 Received: from c-24-60-71-26.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.60.71.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:15:26 +0200 Received: from keith.mckenna by c-24-60-71-26.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:15:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org From: "Keith N. McKenna" Subject: Re: [UX][DISCUSS] Default Document Border Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:14:47 -0400 Lines: 101 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-60-71-26.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 In-Reply-To: Kevin; Kevin Grignon wrote: > Hello All, > > I've read the LibreOffice threads and have a better understanding of the > issues and concerns. Thanks for sharing. > > I still maintain my original UX feedback that the page frame adds noise. In > addition, the current stroke color is rather dark, and can make it > difficult to see the text location indicator, perhaps we could work on the > contrast. One o the problems I see is that what you consider "noise" others do not. In the past I used charts from a OOo spreasheet embedded into a writer document. I found the page boundary helpful in positioning those charts correctly. > As for a solution, I feel that we could we could remove the default full > frame page boundary, and provide the corner marks as seen in Symphony UI. > We could also provide display preferences for users to select no frame, > corners only (a la Symphony), or full frame. Heck the user could even > select the frame colour or page background if so desired. Adding the preferences is fine, but I do not believe that the default full frame should be changed. That kind of change could well be seen by the user community as "change or the sake of change" that serves no real purpose. > To support smart object layout when the page frame is not in full frame > mode, we could display the frame on demand, when an object being positioned > comes in contact with the frame. More broadly, we need smart guides for all > possible intersections. > > See: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121102 > > Thoughts? > > Regards, > Kevin > Regards Keith > > > I'll move the discussion to the mailing list. > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: > >> Hi Gary, >> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 06:48:00PM -0800, NoOp wrote: >>> Just as a heads up regarding: >>> >>> >>> I recommend following the user issues regarding this 'modernization' in >>> the LibreOffice threads: >>> >>> Initial user thread: >>> < >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user/16851 >>> >>> [LO 3.5 - Can't see page margins in Writer] >>> >>> Thread on the LO ux-advise list: >>> < >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.ux-advise/495 >>> >>> [The "no border text" feature in Writer 3.5 is not complete] >>> >>> Thread on the LO dev list: >>> < >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/24267 >>> >>> [No page and Columns boundaries in 3.5] >>> >>> And it seems that the new additions are starting to irritate users: >>> < >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user/17009 >>> >>> [LibreOffice v3.5.0 -- Header/Footer -- How do I disable this] >>> >>> As an FYI: I use and test both OOo and LO so I've no particular bias in >>> pointing this out on this list. Instead I'm hoping that those that are >>> "improving" OOo-dev 3.4.0 consider the *user* reactions to the suggested >>> changes of >>> just in case you plan to actually use the 2009 suggestions. >> >> >> You might be interested in tracking this bug report: >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121102 >> I took the freedom to quote this mail :) >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> Ariel Constenla-Haile >> La Plata, Argentina >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org