incubator-ooo-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dale Erwin <>
Subject Re: Rewrite AOO in JAVA
Date Sat, 01 Sep 2012 01:02:25 GMT
Seems to me that with a code base as large as that of AOO, an 
interpreted language would make it even slower than it is, and it's no 
speed demon now.  I know Java is not a slow as other interpreted 
languages, but still...

Dale Erwin
Av. 28 de Julio 657, Dpto. 03
Magdalena del Mar, Lima 17, PERU

On 8/31/2012 1:53 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Niall  Martin
> <> wrote:
>> I would have thought the developers would be cautious on this one. Many security
experts seem to
>> regard Java as dangerously buggy.
> Oh for God´s sake. Lots of software has "critical" security updates
> during its lifetime... Including the Linux kernel. Microsoft´s own
> .Net has "critical security updates" every "patch tuesday" yet I don´t
> see the same level of paranoia and Reuters advising people to
> "uninstall .Net". Yet, Java always get the scaremongering. It´s no
> surprise, really, since Microsoft has been hard at work to derail Java
> since its inception (see "operation Sunblock", 1997)
> In fact, the latest security scare was with regards to Java usage on
> web browsers (java plug-in), not Java used for desktop apps.
> And for the record, it´s been fixed yesterday with the release of Java
> 7 update 7.
> There´s even Java 7u7 OpenJDK builds for OSX too...
> Sheesh...
> FC

Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard:, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.20540)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message