Mailing-List: contact ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=rogers.com;
  h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=QCdAYY/Ky3V9UahiuF+no1M8CWU26IrObgHCq9w3cc3plu/jD5ZlH+K6uLzoMQ1eR8q7M2HP5b5p/iWPxKBO99rESJKt+NJuPY3SrxceLUsRuTYOrzm+1UFxoa+C81wmftigUd+2x2ErVP3FQfYXS/c8azy+prfV6zGD6tUCmAw=
  ;
Message-ID: <4FCC109B.9050101@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:34:19 -0400
From: James Knott <james.knott@rogers.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:12.0) Gecko/20120422 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is there a windows 7 64 bit version.
References: <rn7ls7lqgbbjieffbb3mfs52h2thpn9gnh@4ax.com>
 <4FCB2258.7080205@apache.org> <jqf9n3$23m$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <e4nns7lasnkpn6afn2m237mcou4jdthuhu@4ax.com>
 <713EFCF8-04AC-41DA-B936-8FD11C4C25F5@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <713EFCF8-04AC-41DA-B936-8FD11C4C25F5@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dave Fisher wrote:
> Successful results may change these thoughts.

I have often wondered why 64 bit Linux versions have been around for 
years, but not Windows.  But then again, the first 64 bit Linux distros 
appeared in the mid '90s, on the DEC Alpha, shortly followed by the 
PowerPC version.  And, of course, Linux was first again on the x86_64, 
well ahead of Windows.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org