From ooo-users-return-1763-apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Jun 4 22:29:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 005009EE4 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30542 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2012 22:29:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30494 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2012 22:29:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30486 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2012 22:29:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:29:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [205.178.146.67] (HELO omr17.networksolutionsemail.com) (205.178.146.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:29:44 +0000 Received: from cm-omr9 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr17.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q54MTNmY013725 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:29:23 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr9 smtp.user=drew@baseanswers.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authenticated-UID: drew@baseanswers.com Received: from [207.255.220.76] ([207.255.220.76:43753] helo=[192.168.1.2]) by cm-omr9 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 8E/28-05613-3C63DCF4; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:29:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Is there a windows 7 64 bit version. From: drew To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4FCD32DE.3000207@apache.org> References: <4FCB2258.7080205@apache.org> <4FCC579F.6070201@apache.org> <1338815464.2489.1.camel@sybil-gnome> <4FCD32DE.3000207@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:29:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1338848962.2680.19.camel@sybil-gnome> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 00:12 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 04/06/2012 drew jensen wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 08:37 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> This is not being ignored: there is a lot of useful information at > >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594 > > You are kidding right - of course it has been and is being ignored. > > Hi Drew, > indeed it's not top priority, but I'd tend to have a slightly more > optimistic view: just because the issue has been mostly inactive for > years, this doesn't mean it will be inactive for years to come; and at > least in this case developers took pains to explain in detail why the > port is not as trivial as it would seem. > Regards, > Andrea. I was a bit over the to with my comments. >From what I understand, the amount of work required to get a viable 64 bit Windows release out is going to require someone in the developer ranks ti take it on, as champion if you will, and drive it forward - or put another way, I think it is a good bit more then an 'easy hack I need to be more patient - there are those here that could do that but there is already a body of work laid out for this project, doing that well needs to be the focus. //drew > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org