Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6B809577 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48769 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2012 13:31:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48730 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2012 13:31:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48721 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2012 13:31:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:31:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SINGLE_HEADER_2K,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.203.82.251] (HELO moving-picture.com) (193.203.82.251) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:31:33 +0000 Received: from cassini.mpc.local ([172.16.15.37] helo=moving-picture.com) by moving-picture.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SSppO-0006VU-8G for ooo-users@incubator.apache.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:24:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4FAD14A0.40904@moving-picture.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:31:12 +0100 From: James Pearson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: glibc problem with 3.4 on CentOS 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "caroline.mpc.local", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I've just tried to use the 32 bit (and 64 bit) Linux builds of 3.4 on CentOS 5 but get errors saying that its various shared libs require glibc 2.7 or 2.11 - i.e: /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/bin/javaldx: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org/ure/bin/../lib/libuno_sal.so.3) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/bin/javaldx: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org/ure/bin/../lib/libxml2.so.2) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsvt.so) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsvt.so) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/../ure-link/lib/libxml2.so.2) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] I've just tried to use the 32 bit (and 64 bit) Linux builds of 3.4 on CentOS 5 but get errors saying that its various shared libs require glibc 2.7 or 2.11 - i.e: /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/bin/javaldx: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org/ure/bin/../lib/libuno_sal.so.3) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/bin/javaldx: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org/ure/bin/../lib/libxml2.so.2) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsvt.so) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsvt.so) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so) /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/../ure-link/lib/libxml2.so.2) The README that comes with 3.4 states: > System Requirements > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * Linux Kernel version 2.6.18 or higher > * glibc2 version 2.5 or higher > * gtk version 2.10.4 or higher Has the System Requirements for 3.4 changed so it now needs 'glibc2 version 2.11 or higher' - or has 3.4 been built on a non glibc 2.5 platform by mistake? Thanks James Pearson --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org