incubator-ooo-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scooter C <>
Subject Re: A moderator's view of this list [was: Re: I Hate Your Product]
Date Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:42:25 GMT
Good Afternoon Group,

The answer is the Open Office Community Forum:

The list server may have change but the website Forum has not.
IF I had known this, I could have directed the "Hate" man to this site.
I am surprised Mr Weir didn't.

Take Care.
College Park, MD USA

Mike Scott wrote   on 4/2/2012 3:25 AM:
> On 01/04/2012 21:08, Rob Weir wrote:
> ....(snipped throughout; attributions missing)
>>>   Bayesian filters cannot work in this case because they assume that 
>>> the
>>> Maybe. I don't know, and thought it might be worth trying. There's 
>>> usually
>>> /some/ key word or phrase that gives the game away.
>> I think it is fair to say it would work some of the time.  But I don't
>> think there are any silver bullets here.
> I agree. But I reckon even a, say 50%, success rate would be of 
> considerable help.
> ....
>> And I assume this is not fun for the user as well.   Writing to 
>> ooo-users
>> is probably not their first choice. I think when a user has a problem 
>> they
>> do things like:
>> 1) Repeat the action
>> 2) Quit OpenOffice and restart and try the action
>> 3) Maybe reboot
>> 4) Maybe hit F1 and see if the online help does anything
> So far so good.
>> 5) Post to Twitter "I hate OpenOffice, it can't do X"
> Irrational. And probably expected.
>> 6) Search Google (or Bing) for some words that they think are related to
>> the problem
> Now there's a conundrum. Google is a bit of an art - often I've found 
> answers quite quickly where non-computer-savvy friends have totally 
> failed. It seems you need a fair bit of experience to see the right 
> keywords.

>> 7) Somehow end up on this mailing list.  But honestly I don't know the
>> exact path here.
> I've wondered that too. If they came via the web site, they /ought/ to 
> be more aware of what the list is than some seem to be. Some will be 
> sent by unscrupulous vendors, so won't know what they're dealing with.
>> So reducing repeated questions helps us and helps the user, 
>> especially if
>> we can get those FAQ's in front of their eyes earlier in the cycle, 
>> like at
>> step 6, or even step 4.  By the time they end up here, users tend to
>> already be frustrated.
> One thing I've noticed lately is how easy it is to forget the 
> exceedingly steep learning curves involved in some of this stuff. I'm 
> an ex sysadmin, so when I don't know some answers, there's a pretty 
> wide knowledge base to build on, and it's usually easy to understand 
> and phrase a problem and find an appropriate arena to get help. /And I 
> take that for granted/. Others don't have that start line, and I find 
> it very easy to get frustrated in trying to explain things to some 
> people that, to me, rate as glaringly obvious yet they simply don't 
> 'get'. And that's /my/ fault, not theirs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message