Return-Path: 
 <ooo-users-return-149-apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C44007C6D
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:56:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 50943 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2011 12:56:21 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-users-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50923 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2011 12:56:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-users@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-users.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50907 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2011 12:56:21 -0000
Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:56:21 +0000
Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1)
  (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain)
  by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP;
 Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:56:21 +0000
Received: by vwe42 with SMTP id 42so4743873vwe.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 05:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.70.228 with SMTP id p4mr13326030vdu.46.1318251379755; Mon,
 10 Oct 2011 05:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.161.20 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 05:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <42940CAF17FFA34F9C2E0F13034B9A16109286047C@VA3DIAXVS131.RED001.local>
References: 
 <42940CAF17FFA34F9C2E0F13034B9A1610928603F5@VA3DIAXVS131.RED001.local>
	<CAP-ksoitU0Fgj6gN3XAvfsrjCvdB4WuGPaX66jT46w+W4ZL3pA@mail.gmail.com>
	<42940CAF17FFA34F9C2E0F13034B9A16109286047C@VA3DIAXVS131.RED001.local>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:56:19 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAP-ksog=ZvPVc+Ciz0gAjV-AQa02uRbHxBCTzBq9qVAMQL1j+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Volume Issue
From: Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org, ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Cross posting to the ooo-dev list, since they might be more familiar
with server-side use of OOo.   Do we know of a regression in 3.3 with
resource leaks and PDF conversion?

-Rob

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Herter, Scott
<Scott.Herter@napersoft.com> wrote:
> OpenOffice 2.4 was tested under both Windows 2008 Server and Windows 7 an=
d did not get slower as time went on. =C2=A0OpenOffice 3.3 was tested under=
 both Windows 2008 Server and Windows 7 and only got slower under Windows 2=
008 Server.
>
> Main memory remained stable over time.
>
> OpenOffice memory would go up until we restarted it after every 1000 uses=
. =C2=A0If we don't restart it OpenOffice will crash before it makes it to =
2000 uses. =C2=A0The crashing seems to be an issue under Windows. =C2=A0We =
have seen the memory increase in the OpenOffice process in Linux but OpenOf=
fice did not crash before our test ended. =C2=A0This is the same for both O=
penOffice 2.4 and 3.3.
>
> OpenOffice leaks Windows Desktop Heap memory, this is a Windows only issu=
e. =C2=A0It eventually eats up all the Windows Desktop Heap for a given vir=
tual Desktop (interactive or service) and the desktop needs to be destroyed=
 and recreated, either by logging out and logging back in, stopping and sta=
rting the service, or rebooting. =C2=A0This is the same for both OpenOffice=
 2.4 and 3.3. =C2=A0Unfortunately Microsoft has not provided a way to look =
at the Desktop heap for Windows 2008 Server and Windows 7. =C2=A0This used =
to be possible under Windows XP and Windows 2003 server. =C2=A0I don't know=
 if OpenOffice 3.3 is eating up Windows Desktop Heap and a faster rate than=
 OpenOffice 2.4. =C2=A0I will have to get a Windows 2003 Server VM going at=
 some point to check that out.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 5:21 PM
> To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Volume Issue
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Herter, Scott <Scott.Herter@napersoft.com=
> wrote:
>> We are using OpenOffice 3.3 on a server for a JEE application. =C2=A0The=
 JEE application talks to OpenOffice using the UNO API to print documents a=
nd convert them to PDF. =C2=A0With 2.4 We managed to get over 1 million con=
versions on a single stress test. =C2=A0With OpenOffice 3.3 it got to aroun=
d 50,000 and slowed down terribly. =C2=A0This was on a Windows 2008 Server.=
 =C2=A0We ran the same test on Windows 7 and didn't have a slowdown. =C2=A0=
We were wondering if anyone new anything about performance issues when runn=
ing OpenOffice 3.3. on a Windows server.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> What was your OOo 2.4 test on? =C2=A0Windows 2008 Server or Windows 7?
> You seem to be changing two variables, platform and OOo version, so it is=
 hard to say what the cause is, at least based on your note.
>
> Did you monitor things like process memory and system used paging file si=
ze? =C2=A0Some sort of resource leak sounds likely.
>
> -Rob
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org