incubator-ooo-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Acevedo <vea1...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
Date Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:56:30 GMT
My proposal in simple words is either 2 of the following options:

	* Make the first Apache OpenOffice.org release get the 4.0 name as it is basically a new
and mostly rewritten version of the current OOo source code.
or

	* Drop the version number from the Apache OpenOffice.org name. 
I think, I will add a third option here, drop the ".org" suffix and go simply with Apache
OpenOffice as the project's name.
 
Michael


________________________________
From: Terry <terauck-aoomarket@yahoo.com.au>
To: "ooo-users@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-users@incubator.apache.org>; David H. Lipman
<DLipman@Verizon.Net>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...

I do not understand the point Michael made in that email.  Is he suggesting that no version
number be used? 

Terry




>________________________________
>From: David H. Lipman <DLipman@Verizon.Net>
>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 1:44 AM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
>From: "Michael Acevedo" <vea1083@yahoo.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been reading the OOo forum and first let me congratulate the Apache OOo team
in
>> completing the transition of the source code earlier this month. As for my proposal,
it
>> stems from one statement made in the OpenOffice.org Forums indicating that 
>> "Fundamentally,
>> as a project "OpenOffice.org" is done." If the following is true I think it creates
a
>> great opportunity to refresh the OpenOffice.org brand. My proposal has the following

>> provision: -
>> Drop the "3" or "3.4" suffix from the OpenOffice.org name and either leave the office
>> suite name as "Apache OpenOffice.org" or "Apache OpenOffice.org 4 * The rationale
for 
>> this
>> provision is the fact that the OOo code will undergo (or has
>> undergone substantial rewriting) to allow the source code to be compliant with the

>> Apache
>> 2.0. licence scheme. * Furthermore, IBM's decision to donate Lotus Symphony to Apache

>> will
>> most likely result in a "code merger" with the Apache OpenOffice project which will

>> result
>> in a very altered (compared to today's) OpenOffice.org source code. Well that's the

>> basic
>> idea behind proposal and I think the brand refresh will be beneficial for the Apache
OOo
>> project.
>> Again, thank you for your time and keep up the good work!
>>
>
>I agree with all aspects of what Michael suggests and has stated.
>
>
>
>-- 
>Dave
>Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
>http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp 
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message