Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F70674CA for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 04:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86091 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2011 04:48:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-marketing-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86062 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2011 04:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-marketing-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-marketing@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-marketing@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86051 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2011 04:48:31 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:48:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:48:30 +0000 Received: by vbbfc21 with SMTP id fc21so2088780vbb.6 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:48:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.69.70 with SMTP id c6mr3541208vdu.65.1323406109101; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.46.197 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:48:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1323342599.34619.YahooMailNeo@web161705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <12320B1B-6155-4836-BF36-E3B140607142@free.fr> <1323133793.84935.YahooMailNeo@web161706.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1323254481.63656.YahooMailNeo@web161704.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <00cd01ccb50b$f8e18a20$eaa49e60$@acm.org> <010d01ccb518$1903e530$4b0baf90$@acm.org> <1323342599.34619.YahooMailNeo@web161705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 23:48:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Publicity (was Native support of the SVG graphic format in Apache OpenOffice.org) From: Rob Weir To: ooo-marketing@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Terry wrote: > I suppose one's point of view is based on observation.=C2=A0 I spend litt= le time on the likes of Twitter and Facebook.=C2=A0 I still have accounts o= n stumbleupon, digg and slashdot.=C2=A0 Are they still in the game? > Digg and Slashdot can drive big traffic. I've had content from my blog on Slashdot a few times, and you can easily get 50,000 - 100,000 visits from that, plus additional traffic from follow up articles. But obviously only a small number of posts get prominent positions there, and they tend to be ones that break news of broader interest, are controversial, or both. If we have a blog post that coincides with our 3.4 release, it may have that kind of interest, especially if we also have a good story for what we want to do in future releases as well. > > What I see happening (because of where I look) is reporters, commentators= and bloggers picking up a news item and writing about it.=C2=A0 Not infreq= uently, the first article or blog entry will be followed by a commentary by= another writer.=C2=A0 The story gains currency by being reported or discus= sed on one or more of many sites which focus on software.=C2=A0 Such articl= es are also mentioned on forums. > That happens still, but Twitter and Google+ are so much easier that many people are sharing small stories or reposting things that way rather than writing a blog post. Of course, this is not an exclusive either/or thing. Many blog platforms allow you to add "Tweet me" buttons, Google+ buttons, etc. > > A link which Dennis posted on the users' list ( http://stackoverflow.com/= q/8418354 ) and the links which Rob posted recently on this list are worth = publicising.=C2=A0 I suppose the point I wanted to make is that they are wo= rthy of more publicity than they get on the mailing lists.=C2=A0 It's all v= ery well for a few people on the lists to tweet or google+ and I don't decr= y efforts like that.=C2=A0 I would just like to see something which can be = picked up by more people, meaning people involved in the project and intere= sted observers. > > I replied to the question on stackoverflow by suggesting a post in the co= mmunity forums. > > By the way, I did not intend to complain about the blog, merely to observ= e that in practice it is an underused asset. > An accurate observation. So what can we do about it? We need topics and we need authors, and maybe we need editors. I tried to set up a wiki page to collect ideas and for people to sign up. The idea was to create a pipeline of blogs posts so we have a steady stream of them. But when I made that proposal I received nothing but grief. Evidently, overt attempts at coordination are anathema at Apache. -Rob > Regards, Terry > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Dennis E. Hamilton >> To: ooo-marketing@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2011 6:40 AM >> Subject: RE: Publicity (was Native support of the SVG graphic format in = Apache OpenOffice.org) >> >> I agree, there are two layers to achievement of visibility. >> >> First there is the authoring and even aggregation of interesting materia= l about >> Apache OpenOffice. >> >> Blogging, with RSS feeds and syndication notifications, is probably the >> lowest-friction authoring case that provides easy commentary and replica= tion. >> (Wikis are lower friction but don't disseminate so well.=C2=A0 YouTube, = on the >> other hand, is a whole different story.) >> >> Then there is chatter via Twitter (my authoring tool does that automatic= ally) >> and other syndications: Linked In, Facebook, Google+, etc.=C2=A0 These c= an broaden >> the interest and extend the conversation.=C2=A0 With trackbacks from pos= ts of others, >> it can become very interesting. >> >> And for starters, someone has to give themselves permission to say somet= hing >> interesting somewhere that provides the ground for visibility and is eas= y to >> publish to. >> >> - Dennis >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:33 >> To: ooo-marketing@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Publicity (was Native support of the SVG graphic format in = Apache >> OpenOffice.org) >> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton >> wrote: >>> =C2=A0An useful low-friction case, for starters, would be use of the OO= OUSER >> Community Wiki.=C2=A0 It is archived and it permits comments. >>> >>> =C2=A0There is also the Roller aggregator.=C2=A0 I have been too lazy t= o figure out >> how to set up a blog category that has a separate RSS feed that goes int= o the >> aggregator, but any committer can do that and create a news stream.=C2= =A0 That takes >> care of the RSS and it puts it on the Apache site in the Roller aggregat= ion.=C2=A0 (I >> forget the correct name for that.) >>> >>> =C2=A0Also, this moribund blog site that Terry complains about still ha= s the >> second-highest number of hits among the Apache Roller blogs.=C2=A0 Those= are coming >> from somewhere. >>> >> >> Partially due to my efforts to cross-promote.=C2=A0 For example, the blo= g >> post on the forum migration was linked to on a Twitter tweet, and then >> retweeted 7 times.=C2=A0 That brought a reach of over 2000 users.=C2=A0 = I can >> also see (thank you, bit.ly) that from Twitter it was posted onto >> Facebook and then shared further. >> >> Again, we can diddle with Roller all we want, but unless you have a >> connection to Facebook, Twitter and Google+ almost no one is going to >> see our posts.=C2=A0 Think of Roller as a publication platform, but don'= t >> expect that it generates its own audience. >> >> -Rob >>