Mailing-List: contact ooo-marketing-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-marketing@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of acolorado@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: acolorado@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksogjiynONnPi-ceNqFzrj__2AZf3viA-8uqrAeHbzC9iPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMK9kTg2DkYyXQP9+hOvEbZ3sK31FYd=UY-ywoS8VXwY_zLphQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksoij++0=ePr9x8kQA0zycC4sXOmCOQMBaORf-OwFsPynPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksojhNjr3RiSNfTzQgNMGbptY=1xV339qLJPoC0D8OOuMtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMK9kTioxjj_t_0r59TmXCn_iCbqWvqf50+UoUMhZqe+VdSaug@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksogjiynONnPi-ceNqFzrj__2AZf3viA-8uqrAeHbzC9iPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:18:31 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CAMK9kTgqn7o2v_QM4_ib7SMheDUy4PwrwYETeiEZxOE6iqH6ww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org G+ Page
From: Alexandro Colorado <jza@openoffice.org>
To: ooo-marketing@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53d5a930eaad504b12ef37f

--bcaec53d5a930eaad504b12ef37f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Alexandro Colorado <jza@openoffice.org>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Alexandro Colorado <
> jza@openoffice.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Hi Google Plus just launched pages, their strategy for Brands and
> such.
> >> I
> >> >> put an OpenOffice.org page at http://plus.ly/openofficeorg or
> >> >> http://gplus.to/openofficeorg
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Haha.  Great minds think alike.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Proposal:  Let's wait another day or two, and see who else has already
> >> created a page.  Then we can sort this out and decide what we want to
> >> do.
> >>
> >> From what I can understand, a page can be verified as authoritative if
> >> it is linked to from the project's home page.  So that will force us
> >> to pick a single one.
> >>
> >
> > What happens if multiple pages point to the projects homepage?
> >
>
> I think that is allowed.  But I'm reading that Google will give a more
> prominent placement in search results to the Google+ Page that is
> linked to from the external website.  In other words you want to have
> the link go in both directions.  Google+ page links to openoffice.org
> (already done), but also openoffice.org links to the Google+ Page.
> That provides the validation that the page is the authoritative page.
>

Ah, understood.


>
> >
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >> > I created two pages:
> >> >
> >> > One for OpenOffice.org:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/110158109203613578110/110158109203613578110=
/posts
> >> >
> >> > And one for Apache OpenOffice:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/101879777854734366426/101879777854734366426=
/posts
> >> >
> >> > -Rob
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> --
> >> >> *Alexandro Colorado*
> >> >> *OpenOffice.org* Espa=C3=B1ol
> >> >> http://es.openoffice.org
> >> >> fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Alexandro Colorado*
> > *OpenOffice.org* Espa=C3=B1ol
> > http://es.openoffice.org
> > fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
> >
>


--=20
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Espa=C3=B1ol
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6

--bcaec53d5a930eaad504b12ef37f--