Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CD03CD8D for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 01:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9398 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 01:32:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-issues-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9336 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 01:32:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-issues-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9327 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2012 01:32:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:32:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.123] (HELO sif.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:32:47 +0000 Received: by sif.zones.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id 6809644C2; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 01:32:27 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org Subject: [Bug 24585] Working with Review is somewhat unintuitive Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:32:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: word processor X-Bugzilla-Component: ui X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: ben.harrison@liquidmesh.com X-Bugzilla-Status: CONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: requirements@qa.openoffice.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=24585 ottadini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ben.harrison@liquidmesh.com --- Comment #12 from ottadini --- I agree with jcarberry on these points and add my comments in []: - a way of advancing to the next change without effecting an action on the current change (e.g., a next or skip button) [many software have this sorted out quite well: Unison File Synchroniser for example by Benjamin Pierce; many merge/diff programs like Meld and WinDiff: all done by simple keystrokes. The Accept/Reject dialog needs to be non-modal, and even never take focus.] - sometimes items are skipped and sometimes not - this flaky behavior needs to be fixed. Some say this is due to a corrupted file, but that does not explain the behavior. [Not sure if this is related, but the 'resolution' of changes is far too granular. An editor of my current document has made many changes, but for some reason LO has partitioned his changes (even when part of a continuous sentence) into many changes. e.g. the added sentence "Our combined research efforts provide greater insight into the subsurface temperature distribution, and the processes and mechanisms that control heat flow." is not seen by LO as one change, but three! Why? There seems no reason to it. Great loss of productivity having to separately manage cases like this (and there are many).] I'd also add: ** I have assigned a keyboard shortcut to "Accept Change". When using the menu item or this shortcut the next nearest change (forward in the document) could be highlighted under some sort of "Express review" mode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.