Mailing-List: contact ooo-issues-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [Bug 116363] Do not stretch Logo in Installation Wizard
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:28:07 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-116363-248469-ykGdraSOot@https.issues.apache.org/ooo/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-116363-248469@https.issues.apache.org/ooo/>
References: <bug-116363-248469@https.issues.apache.org/ooo/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=116363

--- Comment #6 from Dmitry <bdv@inec.ru> ---
my comment from dup-bug follows:

image distorted on 120 DPI screen mode in Windows (called Large fonts in WinXP)

When used hi-res monitor ( in DPI sense, aka small-dot, etc ) user would
normally use 120 DPI in Windows or even 150 DPI (with legacy DPI is 96 AFAIR)

OOO itself seems to adapt rather nicely for that. But the installer renders
pictures ugly.
The main picture on mid-pages at top right corner for example.
Or attached screenshot is another example.

-----

Those monitors were rare thing to have, either ultra-laptops like Samsung Q40,
or special treated as niche monitors like Lenovo L220x.
But now they are getting more and more market share just due to beeing
physicalyl smaller and cheaper.
For example Philips 227E3Q FullHD IPS monitor is physically smaller than old
conventional 1280x1024 LG L1953S

Apple also pushes DPI races with its hyped Retina screens for phones and pads,
other pads would probably follow, including Win8 x86 pads.

I think 120 DPI and even 150 DPI would be more and more common setup now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.