Mailing-List: contact ooo-issues-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: ooo-issues@incubator.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 119170] Do not use cat-B fonts when category B is
 disabled.
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:41:06 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-119170-248469-W6gYi0uW8K@https.issues.apache.org/ooo/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-119170-248469@https.issues.apache.org/ooo/>
References: <bug-119170-248469@https.issues.apache.org/ooo/>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119170

--- Comment #3 from Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org> 2012-04-02 16:41:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Two notes:
> 
> 1 - Iff OFL were to be considered under category-B we could ship them because
> they are already in binary form and are properly separated from the rest of the
> build.
> 

I mean we *could* include them in the default build. The problem is that Legal
hasn't resolved how OFL is classified.

> 
> ____
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> 
> "By including only the object/binary form, there is less exposed surface area
> of the third-party work from which a work might be derived; this addresses the
> second guiding principle of this policy. By attaching a prominent label to the
> distribution and requiring an explicit action by the user to get the
> reciprocally-licensed source, users are less likely to be unaware of
> restrictions significantly different from those of the Apache License. Please
> include the URL to the product's homepage in the prominent label."

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.