Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 978CCDD16 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13205 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 12:40:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13040 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 12:40:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13022 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 12:40:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:40:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of liushenf@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:40:02 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hj13so223175wib.0 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:39:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=C40QvlZuc9yt8R1Cc9SB8bQfnzWlJ3Sn+e+Imu9W0nQ=; b=jl8gUkxreHW7oHkvTIfkvPgHqeCbFzM7+KUAwrYGBRnwItgnMaL8LqwnhIYT7RiywR x3lMLQtcQLtAPZUNo2OKYYBfp1f2s3WfSO0om4FCTaHwJ025wiHlbJ6/EKDGrNWSUpgP 8V2V2ivKd7uqd3zioz3Ggu78u2ai6NbMkVwXQh6vLF8Hzc6UDJfSx/5cCEhPWWW6wCsH KlWas+ncdUwIWzyA0KVAIYeOzfsO3OLrq8s8Vi1JfDnWQuL4CMtQbU1ou0RVk4u0MCAn mVR40yGaTuF6/ulfeOcKvXgyydGK1lbnUCwEMIzYGgYpe3TxCyj5fBtZ9gqrm5Zs9Vyg 3nXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.210.214 with SMTP id u64mr18316742weo.177.1351773582301; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.78.66 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:39:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <509254A7.8090202@gmail.com> References: <509254A7.8090202@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:39:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [UX] - Design Exploration - Dockable Task Pane (Sidebar) - Tab User Interface Design From: Shenfeng Liu To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db2b32309b7a04cd6e5050 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6db2b32309b7a04cd6e5050 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2012/11/1 J=FCrgen Schmidt > On 11/1/12 11:09 AM, Lei Wang wrote: > > I like beveled tab option. > > me too and it was already planned in the past to extend the existing > solution. > +1 to Beveled tab option. > > > > > One question, what kinds of content should be put into the sidebar? A > > navigator window or a style list window should be put into sidebar as a > tab > > panel. > > I think that are good examples and Symphony has used it in a good way > too. But I am also looking forward to make more more use of it to via > extensions and integrate in other systems. It can be a file browser on a > CMS where you can checkin/checkout files, can share files, etc.. It can > be a property SideBar as we know it from Symphony. > property sidebar is a good candidate to implement in phase I. No need to migrated every thing from Symphony sidebar, but start from some frequent used buttons. Another candidate we can consider maybe clipart/gallery. And agree that we should provide interface for extension development. I can see it is a big feature that requires a lot of UX/development/testing effort. So I suggest to create a wiki under 4.0 planning wikito consolidate and trace all related tasks and action items. We may also need a branch to start ASAP. - Shenfeng Liu (Simon) > > A SideBar in general is smooth and nice way to integrate in the office > UI and provide fast access to new interesting features. And last but not > least to make use of wide screen displays ;-) > > Juergen > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Kevin Grignon >wrote: > > > >> Hello All, > >> > >> I've been exploring design alternatives for adding navigation tabs to > the > >> docked task pane. > >> > >> See: > >> > >> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOO_UX_Design_Exploration_-_Docked_Task_P= ane_Container_-_Tab_User_Interface_Design > >> > >> Capture any thoughts or feedback in the discussion section of the wiki > >> page. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Kevin > >> > > > > --0016e6db2b32309b7a04cd6e5050--