May I politely as a mathematician point out that there is a major
difference in the 2 proposals.
Number 1 is a mathematical expression whereas number 2 is a number.
Now I do not know where it is used, but if I copy both suggestions into
Calc, it believes it is text.
Should we not have a format that our own calc accept as a number ??
I agree with andrea that number 2 is more readable (and then forget it is
not a number).
rgds
Jan I.
On 3 November 2012 17:47, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> RGB ES wrote:
>
>> On the help files, you find numbers written like
>> 1.79769313486232 x 10E308
>>
>> This is wrong: it should be either
>> 1.79769313486232 x 10^308
>> or
>> 1.79769313486232E308
>> what do you think?
>>
>
> Yes, it's wrong and your first proposal is correct and more readable than
> the second one. Then I wonder how many times we have these kind of numbers
> in our documentation... and probably when they do appear we are more
> interested in their order of magnitude than in their actual value.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>