Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BE1FDAA4 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79803 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2012 20:06:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79742 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2012 20:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79733 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2012 20:06:29 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:06:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:06:29 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p1so4729514vcq.6 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:06:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.100.5 with SMTP id eu5mr3570154vdb.34.1350158788339; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.157.77 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:06:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1350154122.44515.YahooMailNeo@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <50785359.3010400@apache.org> <1350154122.44515.YahooMailNeo@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 16:06:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Graduation timeline: A reminder for project members, press and list observers From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Rob Weir > ... >>> >>> As a minor update, the only observation we received so far (besides a >>> substantial number of +1 votes, no abstentions or -1) was that almost all >>> the proposed PMC members do not belong to other Apache projects; our >> mentors >>> were asked if they perceived this as a problem, and we didn't get an >> answer >>> from them so far. >>> >> >> Hmmm.... I think there are several PMC members who are involved with >> other areas of Apache: >> >> 1) Don is involved with ConCom, as well as working with Sally on Press >> and Communications. >> >> 2) Others, like Oliver, Louis, etc., have been active in the ApacheCon planning. >> >> 3) Andrew, Juergen and Raphael have worked closely with Infra on many >> things. There may be others. >> >> 4) In general I think we're comfortable working with Trademarks and >> Legal Affairs on an ongoing basis. This includes raising questions >> and getting advice, but some, like Dennis, are active sharing what >> they have learned as well. >> >> 5) Dave is involved with POI. Don and Juergen are also on the PMC of >> the ODF Toolkit. I think Pedro said he was getting involved with a >> new BeanShell project proposal. >> >> 6) There was the work moving the SPI funds to Apache that involved >> coordinating with ASF Treasurer. >> >> So I do not know whether it is accurate to say that no one but Dave >> is "active in more than just the OO project". >> > > The above is all mostly unrelated. I do think we should have included > some of our mentors in the PMC. > > This was a failure in the method we chose to determine the initial PMC: > we chose based on project visibility/popularity and by their function our > mentors have tried to remain with a low profile and intervene only when > it was absolutely necessary. > Once we graduate this role will be played by the ASF Board. They keep a low profile and intervene in projects only when absolutely necessary. > This is something relatively easy to fix though, let's hope it doesn't delay > us too much. > > Pedro.