Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CF0FD7F8 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97162 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2012 15:15:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97068 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2012 15:15:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97054 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2012 15:15:25 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:15:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:15:25 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p1so5304074vcq.6 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.186.147 with SMTP id fk19mr45268606vec.13.1351523724619; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.157.77 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8FB0A8780C1B4BD0B3637BC4FA64C26A@Esprimo7935> References: <50613738.4080308@gmx.org> <5063A28F.5000304@oracle.com> <508DCAE7.9030704@gmx.org> <8FB0A8780C1B4BD0B3637BC4FA64C26A@Esprimo7935> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:15:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ApacheCon] BoF session on AOO community From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:27 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schmidt = wrote: > Hello, > >> The ooo-marketing list is a great place to coordinate international >> campaigns. And we have a German list for local events, yes? > > Yes, we have a German list, but there can discuss only. > > The practical work but needs a lot of different things. First people, but= also material things and not a case by case, but permanently. > > The German community is working on this, but it is also necessary here to= address such things. I think. > >> I think the consultants directory is the best option here. > > Unfortunately, no. > It is necessary but not sufficient, because it takes more than just infor= mation. > AOO business users need confidence in the AOO and this is growing with ma= jor partners. > This is standard tech adoption cycle stuff, see Geoffrey Moore, "Crossing the Chasm", etc. Business rewards those who take risk and see opportunities where others do not. The question is who has their own self-interest aligned with our interest in promoting AOO, and who is willing to put their own skin in the game? Those who take risks will get greater rewards than those who wait for any given technology to become mainstream. >> I see >> companies looking for AOO support, but they are sometimes too small to >> interest IBM. But they would be a good size for smaller companies. >> I'd love to be able to refer them to a local small company. > > In this case, please explain to me why IBM calls publicly to a partner ne= twork. > > see: > https://www.xing.com/net/aoo/allgemeines-diskussionsforum-698796/partner-= netzwerk-rund-um-apache-openoffice-41041065/ > > Or is that not a valid question? > Customers don't come to IBM looking only for OpenOffice. They are looking for a bundle of software and services and OpenOffice might enter the discussions as a small part of the overall deal. We commonly work with business partners, subcontractors, etc., where specialized skills are needed. This includes partners large and small. > Sorry Rob, just the very real problem that I see is that IBM does not und= erstand that small companies can help to open up markets *for IBM*. > But because the small companies can, IBM should take care of it. > I doubt the opportunities will flow from small companies to IBM. > It would be good if IBM would consider the experiences of the past which = consist of OOo, SUN and Oracle. > And you might consider IBM's experience with Linux, where we invested over $1 billion into Linux development, but we don't sell Linux. But we're glad to work with partners on deals involving Linux. > Here on the mailing list, not the place to talk about these things, but I= and other experts know how to act would be to achieve a win-win-situation = for IBM and small companies. > This is not a pure IT question but an business question. (Note: I have st= udied business administration.) > >> Suggestion: >> >> 1) Take one of the general overview presentations from ApacheCon and >> clean it up. Make it into the "standard' AOO overview presentation. >> Put it on the marketing wiki. Get it translated into various >> languages. Maintain it so it remains current. >> >> 2) Start a wiki page to lists events-of-interest. List event, date, >> location, link to website, etc. Project members who are local to that >> event can volunteer to present there. Many are doable as a day trip. >> CeBit is in Hanover, 92 minutes from Hamburg on the ICE train, for >> example. >> >> 3) For critical events where there are no local project members we can >> check with other Apache members, from other projects, to see if they >> can help cover it. In return, maybe we help promote related projects >> at events we are able to attend. >> >> 4) If any critical conference is still not covered, then we look at >> other options. > > These things are true, but they are no real answer to the problems that I= have tried to explain. > > It's not a problem of people, time or money, it is first a question broad= est possible cooperation of all concerned. Not only for individual events, = but rather strategically. > > > Greetings > J=C3=B6rg >