Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMK9kTi1u3qiRQuixhrr_Ni746r4ifrei2UcRM7ugB-ce=LZ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAK2iWdR=21yTAts1X2wxFye4FeXWaOtd=EVYTs3D7fcZ-ppH2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMK9kThRpDkDjsYM5KjLuxwS11fbckxvN6Wv_uVip3PAZNmT7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK2iWdT5nHZpdU_2NqCK8kH=+8UMn=yHFNxZ_DOgd-ShuXBVNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMK9kTi1u3qiRQuixhrr_Ni746r4ifrei2UcRM7ugB-ce=LZ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:53:41 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAP-ksoiTVW5vN-GffpshNZKH_UQjybXiThdiQh7vnQDJZ4PBrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: discussion on new l10n workflow
From: Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Alexandro Colorado <jza@oooes.org> wrote:
> On 10/16/12, jan iversen <jancasacondor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry for asking but what is ML discussions ?
>
> Mailing list archives. This emails are publicly available on the web.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-l10n/
>
>>
>> I will happely update information, but I would prefer to delay it until we
>> have decided which way to go, once that is decided I will make a wiki page
>> with the new workflow.
>
> MM this is why wikis are for, anything you put at this time, is mrore
> updated than whatever is already there (most info is from 2009). So
> the next agreement round will need to update the info over yours, as
> opposed of over people from 2009.
>

I think it is fine to review the PDF.  It is a compact, succinct,
self-contained description of the process.  It makes it easy to
review.

After we agree on what the process is we can figure out where to put it.

The problem we have is that the wiki currently has an elaborate
process that was supported by Sun employees that are no longer here
and servers and permission sets that no longer apply to us.    So that
process is not necessarily the same as we'll have going forward.

But I certainly agree that we need to do something to the wiki.  On
the other hand it could be a good opportunity to simplify.

-Rob

-Rob


>>
>> jan.
>>
>> On 16 October 2012 20:36, Alexandro Colorado <jza@oooes.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/16/12, jan iversen <jancasacondor@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also
>>> combining
>>> > all the notes on open issues I could find.
>>> >
>>> > Please have a look at:
>>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf
>>> >
>>> > and
>>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO
>>> >
>>> > I hope we can have a discussion on the "open issues", and then I will
>>> make
>>> > a design document for a changed workflow.
>>>
>>> I think some of this information needs to be pushed back to the
>>> Localization page:
>>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization
>>>
>>> Including external links to the ML key dicussions and updating
>>> relevant pages mentioned here.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I look forward to hear your opinion, either through wiki or mail. These
>>> > comments will be worked into the document.
>>> >
>>> > have a nice day.
>>> > jan I
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alexandro Colorado
>>> PPMC Apache OpenOffice
>>> http://es.openoffice.org
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> PPMC Apache OpenOffice
> http://es.openoffice.org