Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFDEDD836 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11985 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2012 22:17:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11929 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2012 22:17:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11920 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2012 22:17:47 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:17:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:17:47 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p1so1687795vcq.6 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:17:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.16.179 with SMTP id h19mr5949062vdd.107.1350771465995; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.157.77 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:17:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:17:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Need new logo for openoffice.apache.org From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > >> On 2012-10-20 12:49 PM Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> >>> Well most of the artwork is done, is just a matter of doing the commit to >>> the right branch. Linux has png files so they are taken from the site, >>> which also has the .ico and icm for windows and mac. Besides that, I >>> wonder >>> what else would be needed. >>> Example Writer: >>> Linux: >>> http://www.openoffice.org/ui/**VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/** >>> refresh_icons/pngs/OOo_Writer_**48x48.png >>> Windows: >>> http://www.openoffice.org/ui/**VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/** >>> refresh_icons/icos/OOo_Writer.**ico >>> OSX: Not required >>> Mime-type: >>> http://www.openoffice.org/ui/**VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/ODF_** >>> icons/ODF_textdocument_**256x256.png >>> >> >> Are you trying to eliminate the use of colour for the file icons again? I >> thought we had got rid of the colourless icons imposed on the community by >> Oracle against the community's wishes. >> > > I dont see any other work been doine on branding. Not on the wiki nor on > the website. Can you point out to a different community-builted work about > this? It make better sense to have the ones that Oracle has with the > branding it has, thant has a partially implemented work. > Well, we had lengthy discussions on branding around the time of the AOO 3.4.0 release. That is when we went with the current website logo. But we said at that time that we'd revisit this all with the next major release. So I think any proposals are welcome. But speaking for myself, I'd really like to see a comprehensive proposal, since one criticism of our current state is that we lack a comprehensive approach. Especially for those who are not familiar with this old logo dispute with Oracle, it would be good to put down, in one place (the wiki) a complete proposal. Or, even if we had the outline/template for a proposal, e.g., "any comprehensive branding proposal must define these N elements; 1, 2, 3...N". Then we can ask for proposals and discuss them. Could even have a contest ;-) > >> >> Get rid of the blue orb that Oracle imposed on the community by Oracle as >> part of their corporate branding. The previous logo on >> openoffice.apache.org was far better than the blue orb on there now. Get >> rid of the designs that Oracle imposed on OpenOffice.org. > > > Orb has many threads already, I wonder where you were then, and wha are you > suggesting to do instead. Orb is quite well discussed here. I am not > opposed to go back to the old Sun-Impossed OpenOffice.org logo with the > gulls and blue and black, and get back the ".org". But so far nobody has > really pushed this. > > >> >> >> The original discussion on the lack of color of OO3 generated different >>> options which were ignored, should we adopt them now? >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=112141 >>> >> >> Keep colour in the icons > > > Colors and design are different things, did you open the attachments? They > have color on them and they look pretty opting for a circular iconset looks > much better than having half (application based icon) circular and > (document mime) squared. > > >> >> >> There was some icons donated on issuezzilla: >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=118820 (not impressed) >>> >> >> They are better than the ones you linked to. >> > > Not really. > > >> >> -- >> ______________________________**___ >> >> Larry I. Gusaas >> Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada >> Website: http://larry-gusaas.com >> "An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind >> theirs." - Edgard Varese >> >> >> > > > -- > Alexandro Colorado > PPMC Apache OpenOffice > http://es.openoffice.org