Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72CB8DBB4 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78116 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2012 00:26:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78040 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2012 00:26:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78031 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2012 00:26:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:26:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jancasacondor@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:26:44 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id eq6so6913491obc.6 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:26:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RRZLwCkJKHUQ9Do2HHjN6QX/h9QIip1bOJ/cI0mrs7w=; b=j/uAnqxY5LepHwNCSCbA9D0hPfkJcOv0/Yjc0eKBA5dN5n8NfJbRWPTCIwcYusMRws 6A66bO+jtxG/SDWbBUr/dpSrsbha7/Q/YQ/lBni2lGGjC3WKhRhmiimqD2vzIDSJS3Vp o/IVKkP/H+0g/hL2fibWAq9GOFp3B5L2tdEjAs0tyPc8rVZU5RboP2wV7XYu2KbElJ/i eZPVnKUFz22NoKL0yXd1hyI9d9CuVnuamI3Wumb4zWm5XX+i7RWqjxVtQ98/0vSgVMFQ EQxhg6e+qC0LVcRq4zr289DbZED0yPmDIjHG1yQ5LH7L95NAw3fx7/QiA79AEU3swj8w fP5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.26.230 with SMTP id o6mr13573632oeg.109.1350433583841; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.142.133 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:26:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:26:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: discussion on new l10n workflow From: jan iversen To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1ef120ec31204cc365263 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb1ef120ec31204cc365263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have in the meantime understood the request. Now the document is available under wiki as: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO and also as pdf. best of two worlds. jan On 16 October 2012 22:53, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > On 10/16/12, jan iversen wrote: > >> Sorry for asking but what is ML discussions ? > > > > Mailing list archives. This emails are publicly available on the web. > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-l10n/ > > > >> > >> I will happely update information, but I would prefer to delay it until > we > >> have decided which way to go, once that is decided I will make a wiki > page > >> with the new workflow. > > > > MM this is why wikis are for, anything you put at this time, is mrore > > updated than whatever is already there (most info is from 2009). So > > the next agreement round will need to update the info over yours, as > > opposed of over people from 2009. > > > > I think it is fine to review the PDF. It is a compact, succinct, > self-contained description of the process. It makes it easy to > review. > > After we agree on what the process is we can figure out where to put it. > > The problem we have is that the wiki currently has an elaborate > process that was supported by Sun employees that are no longer here > and servers and permission sets that no longer apply to us. So that > process is not necessarily the same as we'll have going forward. > > But I certainly agree that we need to do something to the wiki. On > the other hand it could be a good opportunity to simplify. > > -Rob > > -Rob > > > >> > >> jan. > >> > >> On 16 October 2012 20:36, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> > >>> On 10/16/12, jan iversen wrote: > >>> > Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also > >>> combining > >>> > all the notes on open issues I could find. > >>> > > >>> > Please have a look at: > >>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf > >>> > > >>> > and > >>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO > >>> > > >>> > I hope we can have a discussion on the "open issues", and then I will > >>> make > >>> > a design document for a changed workflow. > >>> > >>> I think some of this information needs to be pushed back to the > >>> Localization page: > >>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization > >>> > >>> Including external links to the ML key dicussions and updating > >>> relevant pages mentioned here. > >>> > >>> > > >>> > I look forward to hear your opinion, either through wiki or mail. > These > >>> > comments will be worked into the document. > >>> > > >>> > have a nice day. > >>> > jan I > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Alexandro Colorado > >>> PPMC Apache OpenOffice > >>> http://es.openoffice.org > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Alexandro Colorado > > PPMC Apache OpenOffice > > http://es.openoffice.org > --e89a8fb1ef120ec31204cc365263--