Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50B4FD20E for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89682 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2012 09:56:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89449 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2012 09:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89421 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2012 09:56:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:56:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgb.mldc@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:56:33 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id dq11so1746256wgb.0 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7Y9tbkvNBlQLFVxKghCgKpSa2c+Xw6C4Qf5Cvoj8JoI=; b=xq0t34BV1C+hn0ptgQ74cpUefr5f7EC8BVBo9/q1JfubJzemNnk6SpSxdGpS1ZXLs9 cRX1hRK9swZeA8D4qc1HlceZv7T3nAAMo3yyfosNNqbk8/6rGAP1haoBhfilbpOnpueD wTM4MEK1GdrtgQ4TkBTvLmEbeZClXlLSSjTe/737tgptdoYRg6w/z5O+88Cx3bQRbDvW eZY0ILen1+XBN8eBQMwh4Z49Aw+jfbwSFUOBO1Le+NoziYzHv1zzlserg5ek4bHOQGt+ R3B2ZmL3MuQQ1Cef1njg208lAglcHKsJo7bClU6RMAmFNLdl9mi4sti2c+PgaQ4fCRQw 7JfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.91.169 with SMTP id cf9mr4953813wib.1.1350035772880; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 02:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.109.69 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 02:56:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5077D60C.8060206@gmail.com> References: <5077D60C.8060206@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:56:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [UX]: potential new default color for application background From: RGB ES To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043891afad386404cbd9b229 --f46d043891afad386404cbd9b229 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2012/10/12 J=FCrgen Schmidt > Hi, > > I am seeking for some small changes to give our product a little fresh > look. Changes that are more low cost and don't require huge > implementation efforts. > > For example all the grey colors are not so nice and I tried a new color > for the application background. I would like to propose that we change > the default color to a new fresh one. If our users don't like and prefer > the old grey one they can easy revert it via the option dialog. > > The question is about the start center because the changed application > background has no impact on the start center yet. But I think this is a > bug. > > Examples: > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/test/aoo_new_defautl_background.png > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/test/aoo_new_defautl_background2.png > > I know that probably many have an opinion about the color. But more > important for now is the question if we want such a change in general. > In the end the color should fit to other branding items as well. > > UX has probably some comments and feedback here as well? > > Juergen > The change is a good idea, but that blue seems a bit too strong to my eyes. Considering that a normal user will spend many hours in front of the product, light colours are better, IMO. Regards Ricardo --f46d043891afad386404cbd9b229--