Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dave2wave@comcast.net
 designates 76.96.27.228 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/
From: Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <1350359744.66445.YahooMailNeo@web113516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:58:12 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6719C17C-1145-4037-9F12-302B84661925@comcast.net>
References: <50753C05.1070109@googlemail.com>
 <5078364F.3050205@googlemail.com>
 <1350056332.85403.YahooMailNeo@web113512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <507BBA1F.8070002@googlemail.com>
 <1350359744.66445.YahooMailNeo@web113516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org


On Oct 15, 2012, at 8:55 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:

>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Andre Fischer
>=20
> ...
>>> One thing to think about is if we should remove the category A =
tarballs=20
>> too.
>>=20
>> I thought about that, too, and I think we should.
>>=20
>>> At least when updating boost I decided not to upload it because it's
>>> rather big. Plus I think infra would appreciate us using mirrors for =
that.
>>=20
>> As far as I know codespot.com, on which ooo-extras.apache-extras=20
>> resides, is a Google service.  I don't know how much their infra =
people=20
>> like the idea.
>> =20
>=20
> FWIW, I think the load for source tarballs is much less, and likely
> to be manageable, than the interest for windows binaries.

Certainly this is true. But then this is an open source project.

Regards,
Dave

>=20
> Pedro.
>=20