Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DAC2D201 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83018 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2012 19:19:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82945 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2012 19:19:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82936 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2012 19:19:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:19:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 213.209.103.7 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.209.103.7] (HELO smtp2.wtnet.de) (213.209.103.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:19:07 +0000 X-WT-Originating-IP: 84.46.110.107 Received: from f9.linux (pop8-1636.catv.wtnet.de [84.46.110.107]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.wtnet.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9JJIiKr021572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:18:48 +0200 Message-ID: <5081A790.2050002@wtnet.de> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:18:40 +0200 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Estimating contributors by looking at wiki accounts? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 10/19/2012 05:28 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > I recently saw another open source project claim that they had over > 3000 contributors. They derived this estimate by looking at the > number of user accounts they had in their wiki. > > That is quite clever, I thought. Since we use the same wiki software, > I thought I'd check this metric for us. Our wiki says we have over > 58,000 user accounts. > > I know we're doing well, but would it really make sense to claim that > we have over 58,000 contributors? I don't think so. > > I suppose we could look only at accounts where the person has actually > contributed edits, or even recent edits. (MediaWiki is a well-known > target of registration spam). Although the other project did not seem > to filter out inactive or unused accounts, I think the metrics are > meaningless unless we do that. > > What do you think? Or do we even care? Yes, maybe a good chance to tell others some numbers from our project. However, the wording of the number is (for some people) the more important part. So, this should be double-checked. That means it doesn't make sense to say "hey, we have 58,000+ contributors" but more like "... in the last 12 months we got contributions from ~3,000 active people (incl. accounts from SVN, BZ, Wiki, MLs, etc.). Marcus