Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73D45DB45 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66423 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2012 23:19:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66201 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2012 23:19:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66191 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2012 23:19:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:19:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 98.138.91.62 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com) Received: from [98.138.91.62] (HELO nm13-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.91.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:19:36 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.50] by nm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2012 23:19:15 -0000 Received: from [98.138.84.174] by tm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2012 23:19:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp108.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Oct 2012 23:19:15 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 416198.64353.bm@smtp108.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: QTo7SgsVM1nv.osMSp3hOI27R_CJiYRP90rfega0G2aQTCo DGBtAb.oVKBI7YCyAtm_2Tc.JzCJN2zrsjRfLHSQYGQE4LbcVxo.OytceNe_ z1bhr3_rnVpXz.yiUi8AV9.4fKv34oVQgBIg4foBIxQw.8cBqDUwmqqgO3Md KuWGxjvVh0PtkiXLU28BoWQfMnvUuw.ohQbf52PFJc6FPuOPyZqn1xAJhZZM mugILaClO4rfMaxSfKI99Jugm_PoBglYe2bvYV7JQzKd4WYquQY.c8UscLdB hPs9qAqxGgdncFgKqTk86w_iv57yHcps1.LAM8hVIZDaiS8NtG6gX.7QBlun G.DQ_6loma20Yz8hdoM96U9owvdnLqCG7hxVHEYUnbu_B0mZekc70tFyuJ92 ICCri0UejlgOWUMnC2rm3IRwzZE6rhP4MpxpUtnFgfntIZxbEHOZhnTkfFzh hdprQt7oE8qKtHceWOoh8PlyH22CF9ItG90JG4Bkg06hCbNYGZk3vCArV.c8 w3GS57FT8j6SAT_CeD4xuOJ0BY8A7wkC2VHR9ZFbpvmNSNEViTNBn4YEw0Gs - X-Yahoo-SMTP: dHt73eiswBAYjuZ6oL.TTjbe.KQkAIve Received: from [192.168.1.107] (kay.schenk@67.121.235.77 with plain) by smtp108.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2012 16:19:15 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <50808E20.80401@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:17:52 -0700 From: Kay Schenk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [UX]: potential new default color for application background References: <5077D60C.8060206@gmail.com> <5077E6B5.4060400@gmail.com> <20121012122328.GA26469@localhost> <20121012122912.GB26469@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20121012122912.GB26469@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/12/2012 05:29 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:23:28AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> That said, AOO look really horrible in dark themes, but that's another >> issue :) > > http://people.apache.org/~arielch/images/startcenterhc.png > ugly, at least on Linux this would be a definite NO for me! as for Juergen's original post with colors -- either one would work for me, and maybe becasue of my color configuration, they don't look much different. :/ > > > Regards > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MzK "Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat." -- Robert Heinlein