Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CE24DEE8 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67903 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2012 07:25:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67605 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2012 07:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67595 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2012 07:25:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:25:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:25:16 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id jk7so2097391bkc.6 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:24:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VCM0nThe00b1fq586ZVDPkQm6c/f/Rent1Kza/ESfxM=; b=BDamj3vPC5U/ifSF5YtCV6rtJAsZLSwfAWDPmrxiye8vGSeR/xfupgibf+k9tpp3Lx WqGqRCY0iGrv5na2DATlk7Zs4XtkQmGro2QxvABZ5YC2/GQrkcEToqh3AX9iu6Fh6h7/ 5HivBeml6m8NZHYVdrJgQVPSe0TyyXmvw+WDozdjIm9LsmZJXsHZdKmbO/jdF2wiH9qa 3wvxHikeuVVLnRCLLT8ZA4WBufT5lUWYKmSQXhOw/DHPe3mqsJI81Fiyx2BCULW3efSP A4r2eCrSJZZQYecgLRJ7e/BTvHa0GVQser4Oc8S/UtE3AWHMveaFydK0EHlwzEzQ0vuE Z+OQ== Received: by 10.204.149.10 with SMTP id r10mr2813959bkv.61.1350285895770; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.86] (deibp9eh1--blueice2n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm7505002bkq.13.2012.10.15.00.24.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <507BBA4E.6030403@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:25:02 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice Developer Room (devroom) at FOSDEM References: <50602B7A.8070907@apache.org> <50604B2A.4070408@gmail.com> <585007FE-D493-47DB-9C04-FDF5C870FB12@gmail.com> <8FEEAA25-87C7-4CB1-965F-6556E07DC4BF@apache.org> <5060B553.3000003@apache.org> <2A3AF29EC0814FC6B654C369AF804CD6@gmail.com> <50619899.6070903@apache.org> <507481C4.4010400@apache.org> <5075B862.5040308@apache.org> <3D78B5DC-5F71-4387-86B7-362DE148B24C@gmail.com> <5077157E.3020901@apache.org> <507AEB53.1080509@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <507AEB53.1080509@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/14/12 6:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 11/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Yes; apparently LibreOffice had not thought about this, even though it >> was clearly written in the guidelines that organizers would have asked >> to merge similar devrooms. So we'll need to wait. The organizers set >> Saturday as a deadline. > > For the record, I haven't received any news from LibreOffice or from the > FOSDEM organizers so far; as soon as I have news I'll report them here. > We don't have anything to do any longer (everything is already done on > our side), except waiting for the organizers' decision. > Hi Andrea, would it be possible to ask back to the organizers? A deadline is a deadline and we would like to know where we are. The organizers should be able to give an answer in the next days. Maybe the LO community needs the extra days to talk about it at their annual LO conference in Berlin this week. Perhaps Eike who is active at LO and who will probably be in Berlin can take this as some kind of action item to inform their community about it. A shared devroom at FOSDEM where 2 communities can collaborate on the same common goal. In the end we are interested to collaborate with the LO community. I am wondering why I don't see any discussion on their mailing list about this. Who is making the decision, their community, a single person or the TDF board. I don't understand how it works. Juergen