Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rabastus@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
References: <50613738.4080308@gmx.org> <5063A28F.5000304@oracle.com>
 <508DCAE7.9030704@gmx.org>
 <CAP-ksohVf1GtARw-WojHMdHw-sqU4UJiJsEQwGb_O7a9gBnJjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <B379EF382F57404DB11F147AB87DB32E@Esprimo7935>
 <CAP-ksoiYnp4+ya2T7BB5qf7Q_1prktP-r2Fmf_dSjv5Uy_e_pQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8FB0A8780C1B4BD0B3637BC4FA64C26A@Esprimo7935>
 <CAP-ksoinbPevt2XLYymJTJmcHL53XPvyhAyLUTzf8VnNPt0Ndw@mail.gmail.com>
 <39F78AF5E9C6484380FE4C2C88F17B11@Esprimo7935>
 <-5829440148976588799@unknownmsgid>
 <232BAE3139524E319858D7CCBA552435@Esprimo7935>
From: Rob Weir <rabastus@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <232BAE3139524E319858D7CCBA552435@Esprimo7935>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:14:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4066134787525284056@unknownmsgid>
Subject: Re: [ApacheCon] BoF session on AOO community
To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Oct 30, 2012, at 4:19 AM, "J=C3=B6rg Schmidt" <joesch@j-m-schmidt.de> wr=
ote:

>> When we have something to announce you can expect to read it in
>> official places. It won't be something we'll be hiding in strange
>> corners of the web.
>
> That means if an employee identifies proposals on XING does not correspon=
d to the opinion of the IBM? Not officially?
> I think that's a strange point of view.
>
> I think sentences like:
>
> "heute mal eine ganz andere Anfrage, IBM als eine der Firmen, die sich im=
 Apache OpenOffice Projekt engagiert, macht sich auch =C3=BCber ein Service=
 & Support Konzept im Rahmen von Apache OpenOffice Gedanken.
> [...]
> Ich w=C3=BCrde gerne mehr dar=C3=BCber erfahren, wer im OpenOffice Umfeld=
 aktiv ist und an einer Partnerbeziehung auf dieser Ebene mit IBM interessi=
ert ist."
>
> are absolutely clear.

This sounds like research to me.

>
> But no problem, I will contact IBM directly. Thanks for your clarificatio=
n.
>
>

If everything is "absolutely clear" to you then I don't know what you
want "clarifications" on.   But if you do have a question then just
ask it, here or via private email if that is your preference. But I
speak honestly when I say that I cannot figure out what your theory is
here and what you think is occurring.

Rob


> Greetings,
> J=C3=B6rg
>