incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: discussion on new l10n workflow
Date Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:35:25 GMT
May I politely ask if there are other comments or more importantly
objections ?

If not I will continue with the process and keep you posted, please
remember comments are also welcome as the new workflow takes shape.

Jan I.


On 24 October 2012 20:18, jan iversen <jancasacondor@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for your kind words.
>
> see below please:
>
>
> On 24 October 2012 19:49, Louis Suárez-Potts <luispo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> On 12-10-16, at 12:22 , jan iversen <jancasacondor@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also
>> combining
>> > all the notes on open issues I could find.
>> >
>> Thanks. A lot of work. Last it was dealt with was probably (prior to
>> Apache's advent) back in…. I hate to say, "last century."
>>
>> > Please have a look at:
>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf
>> Indeed.
>>
>> >
>> > and
>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO
>> >
>> > I hope we can have a discussion on the "open issues", and then I will
>> make
>> > a design document for a changed workflow.
>> >
>> > I look forward to hear your opinion, either through wiki or mail. These
>> > comments will be worked into the document.
>> >
>> > have a nice day.
>> > jan I
>>
>> I'll go over it. Usually, as others no doubt will mention, my impression
>> is that a big issue has always been qualifying the outcome, incorporating
>> input, and normalizing it, so that what happens in, say, January, can be
>> expected to continue on into the future.
>>
> It was a big job, first describing the current process and run it several
> times to make sure I understood it, and then think about how to do more
> robust and future oriented. I have had a helping hand from my professional
> background where I used to manage project with these kind of problemsets.
>
> I would appreciate any input, this is a floating process,
> development/discussion.
>
>
>>
>> A sidle point has perhaps also do with working with the LibreOffice
>> team—and others working using similar strings, e.g., those nice people at
>> that Mozilla project, among others. Under the Sun regime, licensing issues
>> foreclosed that option. I'd hate to think we are still hobbled by political
>> considerations and that these undercut the terrific enterprise of people
>> like you.
>>
> I am very open minded to that respect, but honestly I have no idea what
> the apache policy is.
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Louis
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message