incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: proposal for new l10n workflow
Date Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:33:30 GMT
I just double checked:

the pointer is: Localization
AOO<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO>, which clearly
stated (the very first lines of the document)

"This document is based on and extents
Localization_for_developers<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_for_developers>.
The document is work in progress showing the result of a detailed technical
analysis of the current process (version 3.4.1) . As such this document
should be seen as a replacement of
Localization_for_developers<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_for_developers>
."


But I will happely remove it if you prefer, but then where do I put a link
to the more detailed description of the CURRENT process.

jan.

On 30 October 2012 13:30, jan iversen <jancasacondor@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am guilty.
>
> see below.
>
>
> On 30 October 2012 13:22, J├╝rgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/27/12 10:51 PM, jan iversen wrote:
>> > Based on the comments I have received, I have updated the document.
>> >
>> > The major changes are:
>> >
>> > - removed l10n web page tools
>> > - no auto-commit in any tools
>> > - proposed changes to pootle server (based on request from andrea, to
>> > use/change existing tools)
>> > - added more text on the translation workflow, inkl. local teams
>> >
>> > The document is available as pdf:
>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10procNew2.pdf
>> > and (due to a polite hint) as a wiki page:
>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO/new_proposal
>> > Furthermore a projectplan is available as a wiki page:
>> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO/workPlan
>> >
>> > this mail is posted on both ooo-L10n and ooo-dev, but please use ooo-dev
>> > for discussions.
>>
>> I noticed that somebody put an "outdated" template on
>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_for_developers which I
>> think is a little bit early.
>>
>> The new page is a great resource to discuss a new workflow and necessary
>> improvements. But the currently "Localization for developers" page
>> describes how it works today.
>>
> The page it points to, is NOT the new proposal, that would be wrong, but
> the first I made with a more detailed description of how it works today.
>
> I hope that is ok ?
>
>>
>> We should avoid confusion here, the new process is under development yet
>> but not available yet.
>>
> I totally agree, and I have not made links that suggest otherwise.
>
>
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>> >
>> > Andrea:
>> > I hope you have time to see if your suggestions are well represented
>> now,
>> > so this document could be used as discussion basis when you meet the
>> pootle
>> > people.
>> >
>> >
>> > Have a nice evening.
>> > jan I.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message