incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC Chair
Date Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:43:47 GMT
Also a +1 from me for Andrea as chair.

Marcus



Am 10/01/2012 11:11 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
> Hi,
>
> On 27.09.2012 23:54, Andrew Rist wrote:
>> I would like to nominate Andrea Pescetti.
>> Andrea is one of the most active and well respected members of the
>> project, and
>> I believe he would make a great PMC Chair.
>>
>
> I am supporting the nomination of Andrea. Thus, +1 from my side.
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/27/2012 2:42 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>> Moving right along...
>>>
>>> I'd like to restart the discussion over choosing a PMC Chair. The
>>> previous
>>> proposed process was discussed in:
>>> http://markmail.org/message/mrgnjtiuum5bovjd
>>> I'd like to take up where that left off.
>>>
>>> Here is the process (with minor modifications) from the original:
>>>
>>> You can read about the duties of a PMC Chair here:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair
>>>
>>> 1) Nominations would be open for 72 hours. Anyone can nominate
>>> someone for the role. Self-nominations are fine. And of course
>>> nominations can be declined.
>>>
>>> 2) If there is only one nomination, then we are done, provided there
>>> are no sustained objections.
>>>
>>> 3) If there is more than one nomination we discuss on the list for
>>> another 72 hours. Discussion would primarily be on ooo-dev, but some
>>> subjects might be directed to ooo-private.
>>>
>>> 4) If after 72-hours discussion there are still two or more nominees
>>> then we vote. Everyone would be welcome to vote, but binding votes
>>> would be from PPMC members. If there are more than 2 candidates,
>>> there will be a run-off vote between the top two nominees if none of
>>> the nominees receive an outright majority.
>>>
>>>
>>> (note: the last item was changed from the original - nothing more
>>> complicated
>>> than a two way run-off is needed, as it is unlikely we have more than
>>> two
>>> nominees.)
>>> I think this process is straight forward enough that we should just
>>> begin the
>>> process now.
>>>
>>> Andrew

Mime
View raw message