incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <orwittm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC Chair
Date Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:11:22 GMT
Hi,

On 27.09.2012 23:54, Andrew Rist wrote:
> I would like to nominate Andrea Pescetti.
> Andrea is one of the most active and well respected members of the project, and
> I believe he would make a great PMC Chair.
>

I am supporting the nomination of Andrea. Thus, +1 from my side.

Best regards, Oliver.

>
>
>
> On 9/27/2012 2:42 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>> Moving right along...
>>
>> I'd like to restart the discussion over choosing a PMC Chair.  The previous
>> proposed process was discussed in:
>> http://markmail.org/message/mrgnjtiuum5bovjd
>> I'd like to take up where that left off.
>>
>> Here is the process (with minor modifications) from the original:
>>
>>    You can read about the duties of a PMC Chair here:
>>    http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair
>>
>>    1) Nominations would be open for 72 hours.  Anyone can nominate
>>    someone for the role.  Self-nominations are fine.  And of course
>>    nominations can be declined.
>>
>>    2) If there is only one nomination, then we are done, provided there
>>    are no sustained objections.
>>
>>    3) If there is more than one nomination we discuss on the list for
>>    another 72 hours.  Discussion would primarily be on ooo-dev, but some
>>    subjects might be directed to ooo-private.
>>
>>    4) If after 72-hours discussion there are still two or more nominees
>>    then we vote.  Everyone would be welcome to vote, but binding votes
>>    would be from PPMC members.  If there are more than 2 candidates,
>>    there will be a run-off vote between the top two nominees if none of
>>    the nominees receive an outright majority.
>>
>>
>> (note: the last item was changed from the original - nothing more complicated
>> than a two way run-off is needed, as it is unlikely we have more than two
>> nominees.)
>> I think this process is straight forward enough that we should just begin the
>> process now.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message