incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <>
Subject Re: Apache OO General Questions
Date Sun, 14 Oct 2012 01:07:24 GMT
Hi Andrew;

----- Original Message -----
> Couple of questions:
> (Q) it was stated to me at one time that integrating changes between AOO and LO 
> would not be overly complicated (bad memory, but maybe it was Tom Davis 
> referencing the fact that Symphony was kept in sync with OOo). Are any changes 
> integrated between AOO and LO (in either direction) at this time? I have been 
> asked this question specifically (as it related to the code clean-up effort in 
> LO), and I generally say "I don't know, but I don't think so".

Some of it has happened in both ways. I won't talk about the LO "relicensing"
because I simply don't understand how it is supposed to work and ultimately
I am not a lawyer.

In the case of AOO. I have in my HD some code that authors have agreed to
contribute. The code will remain uncommitted because:

- In one case the code is big enough that I need a signed iCLA and while the
author has agreed he hasn't really had time lately.
- In another case the code is not big but I have requested the patches be
submitted through bugzilla to keep a record of the contribution (private
email is not trustable nowadays).

In both cases I can wait: the code is not critical, just nice to have.

I wish it were easier to contribute though: we cannot expect someone to go
over the trouble of porting and testing their patches twice. This said, the
latest versions of LO introduce bugs that I can't reproduce on AOO. AOO is
very stable and we want to keep it that way.

> (Q) AOO lists use addresses such as and 
> Assuming that AOO is taken from incubator status, 
> will incubator be dropped from the list names and will current subscribers be 
> ported to the new list?

I would think so, yes.


View raw message