incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system
Date Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:59:44 GMT
FWIW,

Reverting r1394707 on main/set_soenv.in (only) fixes the issue
so one of the 5 changesets involved in that commit is the culprit.

While here, main/solenv/gbuild/platform/linux.mk
has repeated terms between line 140-150.

cheers,

Pedro. 



>________________________________
> From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
>To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> 
>Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 3:01 PM
>Subject: Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system
> 
>The buildsys branch looks broken here:
>
>...
>Configure completed
>
>Run ./bootstrap in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main to provide build
tools and get third-party packages
>===>  Building for apache-openoffice-3.4.1391327,1
>chmod: /solenv/bin/build.pl: No such file or directory
>chmod: /solenv/bin/build_client.pl: No such file or directory
>chmod: /solenv/bin/zipdep.pl: No such file or directory
>chmod: /solenv/bin/gccinstlib.pl: No such file or directory
>./bootstrap: download_missing_extensions.pl: not found
>*** Error code 127
>
>Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel.
>*** Error code 1
>___
>
>Looks like a path issue.
>
>cheers,
>
>Pedro. 
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Andrew Rist <andrew.rist@oracle.com>
>>To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> 
>>Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> 
>>Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 11:16 PM
>>Subject: Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system
>> 
>>I'll checkin the code this week - was trying to get a working env with he branch,
and was having the usual issues.
>>Don't know how far we're taking this , but would be nice to leave the build cleaner
and more stable...
>>
>>A
>>
>>Sent from my iThingie
>>
>>On Sep 30, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ariel;
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile <arielch@apache.org>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:07:03AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>>>> There is currently nothing here, in fact trunk is more up to date.
>>>>> Can I start committing stuff or should Andrew do it?
>>>> 
>>>> IMHO only Andrew, as Oracle representative, can commit the patches. The
>>>> idea is to ensure that patches are granted by Oracle without the need to
>>>> ask for another software grant for this particular cws. I guess this
>>>> should be the procedure people should follow if interested in getting
>>>> cws code granted by Oracle; the other way is to ask for a software grant
>>>> on every file in the cws, but I guess that this won't scale (Oracle will
>>>> have to redo the same amount of work they did for the original software
>>>> grant).
>>> 
>>> OK, I can wait.
>>> 
>>>> Concerning this particular case, once Andrew commits the patches, there
>>>> should be some agreement on what to do: IMHO, the first thing should be
>>>> to ensure that the code builds in Windows, Linux and MacOSX (that cws
>>>> didn't originally take into account OS2 nor FreeBSD), otherwise there is
>>>> the chance that changes made for OS2/FreeBSD/Solaris/etc end up breaking
>>>> something that was actually working in the cws; and it may be then hard
>>>> to guess where and why it got broken (just like the boost/stlport case).
>>> 
>>> I expect the only files that I have to touch are FreeBSD specific so that
>>> probably won't be the case here. In any case I would expect the branch
>>> won't be merged into trunk until any issue with the FreeBSD and/or
>>>  Linux/Mac Windows ports are fixed.
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> 
>>> Pedro.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message