Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DC41DC80 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21576 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2012 22:14:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21501 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2012 22:14:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21493 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2012 22:14:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:14:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gcaiod-ooo-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.3] (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:14:30 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TFuRI-00075k-Df for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:14:12 +0200 Received: from c-24-60-71-26.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.60.71.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:14:12 +0200 Received: from keith.mckenna by c-24-60-71-26.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:14:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org From: "Keith N. McKenna" Subject: Cancel Request for lazy Consensus. Was Re: [User Docs] What do we as a community want for user documentation or AOO) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:13:50 -0400 Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-60-71-26.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Based on much feedback it appears that my enthusiasm got a little wild and that re Reguest for lazy consensus was not the right approach. Given that I hereby Rescind the Request or Lazy Consensus on the documentation and will proceed to JFDI. For any that are interested in helping with this effort more information on working at ODFAuthors can be obtained at there website: http://www.odfauthors.org/ This will close this thread. Hopefully there will be more as the eort progresses. Tank you all for your patience with my inexperience and your guidance. It is truly appreciated. Regards Keith Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> Greetings All; >> >> In order to stimulate some discussion on user documentation I have added >> the hollowing page to the User Documentation Plan on the Plannig Wiki: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Guides+Revisted. >> >> It offers 3 scenarios or the creation of the docs. I believe that we can >> no longer put this issue aside. >> >> Please take a look at the page and feel free to comment there and on this >> list. Also feel free to add to or change any content there. >> >> Regards >> Keith N. McKenna >> >> > Based on the discussion in this thread and on the wiki page it appears > for the short term that Scenario 2 is the best way to go. At this point > I would like to ask for lazy consensus to use ODFAuthors site and the > 3.4 documents already there to create and publish updated documentation. > I will leave this open until 2012-09-26 at 05:45 UTC. > > Regards > Keith N. McKenna > > >