Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A56CDDE8D for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62792 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 21:02:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62689 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 21:02:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65063 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2012 17:48:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dacriswell@raytheon.com designates 199.46.199.198 as permitted sender) MIME-Version: 1.0 Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Will there be an "official" Solaris build? From: David A Criswell To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:46:45 -0500 X-Mailer: Lotus Domino Web Server Release 8.5.3FP1 March 07, 2012 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Notes Server on MK2-MSG09/SRV/Raytheon(Release 8.5.3FP1|March 07, 2012) at 09/12/2012 12:46:45, Serialize complete at 09/12/2012 12:46:45, Itemize by Notes Server on MK2-MSG09/SRV/Raytheon(Release 8.5.3FP1|March 07, 2012) at 09/12/2012 12:46:45, Serialize by Router on MK2-MSG09/SRV/Raytheon(Release 8.5.3FP1|March 07, 2012) at 09/12/2012 12:46:45 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0061A9EE86257A77_=" X-Spam-Score: 0.00% X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0061A9EE86257A77_= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 "RGB" at the AOO Community Forum encouraged me to bring my question here..= . Thanks Will there be an "official" Solaris build? by gpspilot =BB Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:58 pm=20 RGB wrote:You can find non official Solaris builds for AOO 3.4 here: Apache= OpenOffice Solaris x86 My organization had StarOffice on our Solaris workstations for many years, = then upgraded to OpenOffice 3.3, and now we'd like to upgrade to AOO 3.4, b= ut our administrators are leery of installing "non official" builds. Has Apache dropped support for Solaris? My googling has not turned up any o= fficial announcement of this. Can we hope to see Solaris make a reappearanc= e at http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html? According to http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f= =3D6&t=3D53698#p234768, as of four months ago there were only two "major" b= ugs in the Solaris build, and one of them has been fixed. So it sounds like= the current Solaris build is of good quality. Why wouldn't Apache adopt it= as an officially-supported platform? I think we Solaris users deserve to know the "roadmap" for where AOO is hea= ding. Thanks OpenOffice 3.3 on Solaris Re: Will there be an "official" Solaris build? by RGB =BB Wed Sep 12, 2012 6:08 am=20 AFAIK, at the moment there are some technical problems... like the lack of = a proper build environment.=20 You'll get better answers on the dev mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org no need to subscribe to send an email there (the traffic is huge...), but i= f you send your question without subscribing, please make the situation cle= ar on the first line of your email so people could know they need to add yo= u to the CC list. There are two types of people: the ones that believe that there are two typ= es of people and the ones that not. openSUSE 11.4 with KDE SC 4.8.4 / AOO 3.4.1 --=_alternative 0061A9EE86257A77_=--