Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of orwittmann@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <50653FE6.80406@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:12:54 +0200
From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <orwittmann@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: build svtools and sw with debug
References: <k3uvo5$5cg$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <1348669968.94239.YahooMailNeo@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <CAP-ksog9=FwY8FquEZZXmCRcEu+Gheso53jHTNspTKAveNWprw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1348671023.9283.YahooMailNeo@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <50631D21.1000608@gmail.com>
 <1348674451.90255.YahooMailNeo@web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <20120927141132.GB26362@localhost> <50646DC3.1070502@googlemail.com>
 <1348763243.59400.YahooMailNeo@web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <20120927174904.GC26362@localhost>
 <1348771037.65366.YahooMailNeo@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <1348775697.5008.YahooMailNeo@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1348775697.5008.YahooMailNeo@web113502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On 27.09.2012 21:54, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Answering to myself ...
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Pedro Giffuni
> ...
>>
>> Hi Ariel;
>>
>>>   From: Ariel Constenla-Haile <arielch@apache.org>
>>
>>>
>>>   On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>>>    The big question here, at least for me, is why a boost update causes
>>>>   trouble to stlport and why it only affects Windows.
>>>
>>>   Google lead me to
>>>
>> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-build-boost-1-48-with-STLport-5-2-1-td4372308.html
>>>
>>>   "My best guess is the /D_STLP_DEBUG define which enables enhanced
>>>   debugging magic (iterator validation etc.) which might not be binary
>>>   compatible with Boost."
>>>
>>
>> Nice find! The debugging capabilities in stlport are indeed considered an
>> important advantage over other implementations. According to OpenGrok
>> we define that macro in STLport-4.5.patch and a bunch of other places.
>>
>
> Actually, the key definition is here:
>
> http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/Current%20(trunk)/solenv/inc/settings.mk#894
>
> We already ignore USE_STLP_DEBUG for OS2. Should we add Windows to the list?
>

Not having CDEFS+=-D_STLP_DEBUG means that we will have no additional checking 
stuff in a DEBUG=yes build. Right?


My current impression is the following:
- the new boost version makes more or different use of stl
- we are not building with the "right" compiler and link switches in DEBUG=yes 
builds.
- the three needed adjustments to module setup_native, svtools and sw avoid the 
build breakers. I am not sure, if they are only workaround


Best regards, Oliver.