Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-26031-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63B28D107
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Sat, 15 Sep 2012 14:01:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 39701 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2012 14:01:33 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39635 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2012 14:01:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39625 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2012 14:01:33 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 14:01:32 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates
 213.209.103.7 as permitted sender)
Received: from [213.209.103.7] (HELO smtp2.wtnet.de) (213.209.103.7)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 14:01:24 +0000
X-WT-Originating-IP: 84.46.110.107
Received: from f9.linux (pop8-1636.catv.wtnet.de [84.46.110.107])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by smtp2.wtnet.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8FE7v0E013890
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:08:01 +0200
Message-ID: <50548A1B.8070704@wtnet.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:00:59 +0200
From: "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.mail@wtnet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de;
 rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moderating ooo-private
References: 
 <CAKQbXgCvHSLmcg-F0C=cGqpaKpfDn82dBpR1YVfU-2EFZEFTdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120915112051.GA26530@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20120915112051.GA26530@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 09/15/2012 01:20 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> Hi Ross,
>
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 08:42:13AM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> Many user enquiries come to ooo-private and are moderated through. They
>> shouldn't be.  That list should have almost zero traffic.
>>
>> Users are finding the list somehow, seems the documentation needs fixing.
>
> Grep'ing the main site, it seems they come from somewhere else:
>
> ooo-site]$ git grep --line-number "ooo-private@incubator.apache.org"
> content/distribution/index.html:69:contact the<A HREF="mailto:ooo-private@incubator.apache.org">Apache
> content/distribution/index.html:84:<P>Please contact the<A HREF="mailto:ooo-private@incubator.apache.org">Apache
>
> Only two matches, and in this page, not very accessible.

Thanks for your quick search.

I doubt that this could be the reason for the many requests on private@. 
Also they are typical enduser/support questions and contain no hint or 
pointer to something distribution-specifc.

However, it could be changed to point to ooo-dev@.

Hm, but this wouldn't help for support questions as they should go to 
ooo-users@. ;-)

Marcus