Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03EFED7E6 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73146 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2012 09:31:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73030 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2012 09:31:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73020 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2012 09:31:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:31:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of orwittmann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:31:09 +0000 Received: by lban1 with SMTP id n1so2541276lba.6 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 02:30:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3ixp44PvePtJwyRCcAR3XBQ7Ty8GTt1/D6I5uzeX6S4=; b=A0EnjZ+0nrhRZ//lkqaB0QVONwwbiLvCBKxPn/Vi5Cz+m1ebDTIqb2gF5x8pUFGcG3 HuKMLBqkcVRw9vfQVQot+bCOxjBcYNv1Hwg7c0fnvyruxEkiaOu2jxBEH/Sg3dI7thz1 rd965hIwNxUywfIqfYenQcBp0+T1POalCR3NERaBjlx1XI3RF7vUcePYDPPGvPUgbEjB A94spYQyB4NTDmy6iXfLnotuE1JbWV0Xmz1glBUNPBajy3+RFFHPpnVtMXzwOmuGK8jV X4GhD9D4a5d/XkgyXlOy4Ot0OHFkZAb6jz6mgplvysAl5wxhTUOAmn7nBAGhb9BrEx4P 6iyg== Received: by 10.112.38.69 with SMTP id e5mr3261745lbk.14.1346664648608; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 02:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.72] (deibp9eh1--blueice2n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm3119531lbi.13.2012.09.03.02.30.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 03 Sep 2012 02:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <504478C4.9050005@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:30:44 +0200 From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Does anyone know the status of OO performance item? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Him On 31.08.2012 10:18, shzh zhao wrote: > hi, > > I found there is an item to improve the OO performance. > > http://www.openoffice.org/tools/performance/ > > Investigate reducing the save and load time of OpenOffice.org 6.0 files > (XML): > > - > > Find where it needs how much time. > - > > Think about where and what to optimize. > - > > Test the above to see how much reduction in save and load time can be > achieved, if any. > > In Progress > > Sascha Ballach (Spreadsheet) > Daniel Vogelheim (Text) > Bj�rn Milcke (Chart) > Christian Lippka > > Does anyone know the status of this item? > This one seems to be very very outdated as OpenOffice.org has introduced ODF as its native format for OOo 2.0 (released 10/2005, if I remember it correct). Best regards, Oliver.