Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:47:02 -0300
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile <arielch@apache.org>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system
Message-ID: <20120930164702.GA2880@localhost>
References: <505A1DC4.5030600@oracle.com>
 <1348084712.89617.YahooMailNeo@web113512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <5060465D.5010904@googlemail.com>
 <50608AEA.30908@oracle.com>
 <50618DE0.8070005@googlemail.com>
 <20120925132115.GA5166@localhost>
 <50643EC0.2000404@googlemail.com>
 <1349021223.69520.YahooMailNeo@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1349021223.69520.YahooMailNeo@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Pedro,

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:07:03AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> There is currently nothing here, in fact trunk is more up to date.
> Can I start committing stuff or should Andrew do it?

IMHO only Andrew, as Oracle representative, can commit the patches. The
idea is to ensure that patches are granted by Oracle without the need to
ask for another software grant for this particular cws. I guess this
should be the procedure people should follow if interested in getting
cws code granted by Oracle; the other way is to ask for a software grant
on every file in the cws, but I guess that this won't scale (Oracle will
have to redo the same amount of work they did for the original software
grant).

Concerning this particular case, once Andrew commits the patches, there
should be some agreement on what to do: IMHO, the first thing should be
to ensure that the code builds in Windows, Linux and MacOSX (that cws
didn't originally take into account OS2 nor FreeBSD), otherwise there is
the chance that changes made for OS2/FreeBSD/Solaris/etc end up breaking
something that was actually working in the cws; and it may be then hard
to guess where and why it got broken (just like the boost/stlport case).


Regards
--=20
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=3aMg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--