Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
References: <505883F9.4050001@googlemail.com>
 <1347983663.32283.YahooMailNeo@web113504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <50589E60.4070707@googlemail.com>
 <1347996890.57690.YahooMailNeo@web113514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <5058CF73.5010504@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <1347998634.86486.YahooMailNeo@web113503.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
Reply-To: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [code] building trunk,
 rev. 1386983 break in setup_native
To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <5058CF73.5010504@googlemail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A=0A=0A> Subject: [OT] Re: [code]=
 building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native=0A> =0A> Hi Pedro,=0A> =
=0A> On 18.09.2012 21:34, Pedro Giffuni wrote:=0A>> =0A>>  Hi Oliver, *=0A>=
> =0A>>>  ________________________________=0A>>  ...=0A>> =0A>> =0A>>>  BTW=
, I had seen a couple of warnings on the build of module stlport =0A> sayin=
g=0A>>>  something like "duplicate symbol/declaration/? ignored". =0A> Thus=
, may be something=0A>>>  in stlport is triggering with issue.=0A>>> =0A>> =
=0A>>  stlport is something that I have been debating myself if it should b=
e =0A> updated=0A>>  or just turned off for good. I tend to lean over the l=
ater but it would =0A> certainly=0A>>  be nice to clean this boost issue ne=
vertheless.=0A>> =0A> =0A> Yes, it would be great to get rid of stlport.=0A=
>=0A=0AJust curious. Do you still get an error if you build --without-stlpo=
rt ?=0A=0APedro.