incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yong Lin Ma <mayo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [QA] Quality of bug reports and QA in bugzilla
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:55:05 GMT
-1.

Herbert,
I would like to save you the effort to make the change, even if it
won't cost much.

The key thing here is we should be careful and avoid opening duplicate
or invalid issues as many as we can.

I would like to see some concrete examples, especially invalid issues.
And see if this is pervasive for all the reporters who have confirm
right.





On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Herbert Duerr <hdu@apache.org> wrote:
> On 19.09.2012 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Regina,
>>>
>>>> Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
>>>> your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
>>>
>>>
>>> i am pretty sure that i did not set the "confirmed" status when
>>> submitting a new issue,
>>> default status is "confirmed" - and you have to select "Show Advanced
>>> Fields"
>>> to see the listbox ... this seems to be the root cause of the problem ...
>>
>>
>> I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
>> even if the reporter has canconfirm privileges. IMHO "confirmed" means
>> "confirmed by some else".
>
>
> Seeing so much consensus I'm confident that we'll reach "lazy consensus" by
> next monday (2012/9/19 + 72h) and I volunteer to change the behavior then.
>
> So please speak up now if you disagree with the opinion that the extra step
> to the "confirmed" status is an idea that does benefit the quality of our
> project.
>
> Herbert



-- 
Regards

Yong Lin Ma

Mime
View raw message